Daniella Balasal, Policy Planner, reminded Committee of an informal discussion with some members prior to COVID-19 to discuss the opportunity for participation in the advancement of some of the action items.
Peter Howarth, member, referenced the action list of items and was of the opinion that the items should be advanced by various staff across the City. His perspective of role of the Committee was to function in an advisory capacity and the creation of sub-committees at this point to advance the action items will not be effective. He noted willingness to function as an ambassador for the Committee.
Committee discussion and comments on this matter included the following:
- The need for a discussion on the action list of items and the direction to be pursued
- Support for the comments provided that the role of the Committee is to function in an advisory capacity
- Suggestion that updates are required from staff on the status of the action items in order to act as an ambassador for the Committee
A motion was put forward to defer the item to the next Committee meeting in January 2021.
Committee discussion followed and it was suggested that clarification was required from staff on the role of the Committee.
In response to the comments provided by Committee, Ms. Balasal advised that some alternate scenarios on the future role of the Committee, and options and recommendations with respect to the action items can be provided.
A second motion was put forward to request staff to report back on the role of the Committee with respect to advancement of the age-friendly action items.
The motion in its entirety was considered as follows: