Sylvia Menezes Roberts, Citizen Member, raised concerns regarding the number of students affected by the lack of transportation to and from schools. In addition S. Menezes Roberts outlined municipalities that offer programs for student transportation.
The following motion was introduced for consideration:
Whereas Peel District School Board has a Regional Learning Choice program with specialty schools, that do not offer transportation to students.
Whereas students attending those schools often have to be driven to them, or parents need to spend thousands of dollars a year for private busing.
Whereas often summer school is needed most by marginalized students, and PDSB does not provide transportation to them.
Whereas switching schools is often adversely impacts a student’s education, yet no transportation is provided for them.
Whereas the lack of transportation support can constitute a significant equity barrier for marginalized students.
Whereas transit passes would empower students with greater freedom and access to things like sports programs, libraries, and community centres, which particularly benefits all students, particularly marginalized students.
Whereas 70% of households in Brampton contain children.
Whereas if students get used to taking transit in school, they are more likely to persist taking transit after graduation.
Therefore it is the opinion of the Transit Advisory Committee that:
- The City of Brampton collaborate with Peel District School Board, other relevant school boards, and the Region of Peel to provide transit passes with students in relevant categories, especially high school students.
- That if feasible, a pilot begin for the 2022-2023 year, with pilot schools being Turner Fenton Secondary School and Central Peel Secondary School.
Staff advised the City of Brampton has worked with the school boards in the past and that they would be happy to support the board in future discussions to come up with services that may be able to assist students/families.
Committee discussion included:
- Members raised concerns regarding the lack of information surrounding the financial implication if the motion is supported.
- Staff outlined that there would be a substantial amount of work involved to determine all implications on the City as a whole.
- Concerns raised regarding clause 1 not referring to a feasibility study.
- suggestion to refer the item back to staff for further review.
Alina Grzejszczak requested a friendly amendment to include the wording "free for students"
S. Menezes Roberts did not accept the friendly amendment and clarified that the request is to have staff look into the feasibility and how it can be implemented.
A recorded vote was requested and the motion carried as follows: