Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Jarmanjit Singh Dehriwal (Chair)
  • Baljit Mand (Vice-Chair)
  • Jotvinder Sodhi (Vice-Chair)
  • Ron Chatha
  • Paul Khaira
  • James Reed
  • Sarbjeet Saini
  • Thisaliny Thirunavukkarasu
  • Manoharan Vaithianathan

 

 

 

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

Accessibility of Documents: 

Documents are available in alternate formats upon request. If you require an accessible format or communication support contact the Secretary-Treasurer at [email protected] or 905-874-2100, TTY 905.874.2130 to discuss how we can meet your needs.


Note: This meeting will be live-streamed and archived on the City’s website for future public access.


PUBLIC RECORD: Personal information collected because of this public meeting is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA), the Planning Act and all other relevant legislation, and will be used to assist in deciding on this matter.  All personal information (as defined by MFIPPA), including (but not limited to) names, addresses, opinions and comments collected will become property of the City of Brampton, will be made available for public disclosure (including being posted on the internet) and will be used to assist the Committee of Adjustment and staff to process this application.

Nicole Capogna, Region of Peel Comments, dated February 20, 2025

That the following agenda items and minor variance applications, before the Committee of Adjustment at its February 25, 2025, meeting, be approved subject to the conditions set out in the staff recommendation for each respective application:

Item #

Application #

Location

8.1

B-2025-0001

10194 Heart Lake Road

9.3

A-2024-0409

22 Fruitvale Circle

9.5

A-2024-0457

5 Sutherland Avenue

9.7

A-2024-0459

32 Willick Place

9.11

A-2024-0463

1 Riva Ridge Drive

9.12

A-2024-0464

8 Dunegrass Way

9.14

A-2024-0466

6101-6261 Mayfield Road

9.16

A-2024-0471

24 Peak Drive

9.17

A-2024-0474

130 Fandango Drive

9.18

A-2024-0476

1 Tennant Drive

9.19

A-2024-0477

152 Clover Bloom Road

9.21

A-2024-0480

107 Eastbrook Way

9.22

A-2024-0481

52 Commodore Drive

9.23

A-2024-0482

6 Mirabell Court

9.25

A-2024-0484

116 Starhill Crescent

9.26

A-2024-0485

20 Bucksaw Street

9.27

A-2025-0001

171 Advance Blvd, Unit 22

9.28

A-2025-0002

115 East Drive, Units 1-5

9.30

A-2025-0004

21 Estateview Circle

9.31

A-2025-0005

42 Beckenham Road

9.32

A-2025-0006

3 Walker Drive

9.34

A-2025-0008

21 Banting Crescent

9.36

A-2025-0012

9 Rae Avenue

9.37

A-2025-0013

11499 The Gore Road

9.38

A-2025-0014

3 Knightsbridge Road

 

 

 

This decision reflects that in the opinion of the Committee, for each application:

1.The variance authorized is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building, or structure referred to in the application, and

2.  The general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law and the City of Brampton Official Plan is maintained, and the variance is minor.

Mantella Corporation


21 Van Kirk Drive 


Plan M286, Part Blocks J&L, RP 43R8869, Parts 3&4, Ward 2


The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to the grant of a servicing easement over 21 Van Kirk Drive in favour of 25 and 35 Van Kirk Drive.


Joseph P. Plutino, authorized agent deferral letter, dated January 29, 2025


 

A&V Cavallo Investments Ltd. c/o Anthony Cipriani


180 Bovaird Drive West


Con 1, WHS Part Lot 11, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit motor vehicles sales establishment with accessory Office, Motor vehicle repair shop and motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing), whereas the by-law does not permit the use; 
  2. To allow 165 parking spaces on site, whereas the by-law requires 171 parking spaces;  and
  3. To permit 0 car stacking spaces for the motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing), whereas the by-law requires 10 car stacking spaces for the motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing).

(See item 9.33)

Vandyk Heart Lake Limited 


10194 Heart Lake Road


Chinguacousy Con 2 EHS, Part Lot 11, RP 43R26015, Part 1, RP 43R31217, Part 5, Part Part 4, Ward 2


The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the committee to grant a servicing and access easement located at 10194 Heart Lake Road be established in favor of the adjacent landowner to the east.

Muhammad Muneeb Khan


29 Torrance Woods


Plan M426, Lot 163, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a lot coverage of 39.70%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%; 
  2. To permit a driveway width of 7.96 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; 
  3. To permit a separation distance of 2.31 metres from the garden suite to the principal dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum separation distance of 3.0 metres from the garden suite to the principal dwelling; 
  4. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.0 metre to a proposed garden suite, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.8 metres to a garden suite; and 
  5. To permit a rear yard setback of 1.0 metre to a proposed garden suite, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 2.5 metres to a garden suite.

Henry Wilson


52 Donna Drive 


Plan M763, Part Block 242, RP 43R15981, Parts 22, 23, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a 0.98 metres wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit; 
  2. To permit an above grade door in a side yard having a width of 0m from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door, whereas the by-law requires the side yard within which the door is located having a minimum width of 1.2 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door;
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.98 metres to existing and proposed below grade windows, whereas the by-law does not permit below grade windows where the interior side yard width is less than 1.2 metres;
  4. To permit 0 metre setback to the landing for an above grade side entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9 metre (2.95 feet) to any steps (or landings) in the interior side yard; and 
  5. To permit a total of 1 parking space, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 2 parking spaces for one additional residential unit.

Mohammad Shahzad, Ayesha Zahid Hussain


22 Fruitvale Circle 


Plan 43M2058, Lot 338, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 1.61 metres to an existing deck, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 3.5 metres to a deck off the main floor.

Surjit Singh Boparai, Naranjan Boparai, Navneet Boparai, Harminder Boparai


22 Hedgerow Avenue


Plan M652, Lot 105, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed garden suite having a gross floor area of 44.12 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 35 square metres for a garden suite in all other residential zones.

Agyei Peprah-Asiase, Irene Sarpong Peprah-Asiase


5 Sutherland Avenue


Plan 889, Lot 195, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a front yard setback of 5.29 metres to a proposed second storey addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 6.0 metres.

Kuldip Singh, Jasvir Kaur Sekhon


46 Bromley Crescent 


Plan 688, Lot 123, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed garden suite having a gross floor area of 45 square metre, whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 35 square metre for a garden suite.

Amarjeet Singh, Darshan Didar Kaur


32 Willick Place


Plan M1409, Lot 113, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.56 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side, and 0.6 metres on the other side; and 
  2. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard.

Razeika Khan, Abdool Rahman, Meena Rahman


10 Kentucky Drive


Plan M829, Lot 139, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.391 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres metres; and
  2. To permit 0.532 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Piratheepan Shanmuganathan


122 Eldomar Avenue


Plan 521, Lot 159, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 2.40 metres to a proposed two-storey single detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres; 
  2. To permit a rear yard setback of 9.16 metres to a proposed two-storey single detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 9.63 metres; and
  3. To permit a lot coverage of 34.83%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

Tejinder Singh Vohra


2 Glengrove Court


Plan 860, Part Lot 148, RP 43R1697, Part 6, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a lot coverage of 38%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33.3% for a semi-detached dwelling;
  2. To permit a proposed two-storey garden suite having a gross floor area of 49.12 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 35 square metres in all other Residential zones;
  3. To permit a proposed two-storey garden suite having a height of 6.7 metres, whereas the by-law permits a garden suite having a maximum height of 4.5 metres in all other Residential zones; and 
  4. To permit a proposed two-storey garden suite having a separation distance of 1.22 metres from the existing attached carport, whereas the by-law requires a minimum separation distance of 3.0 metres from the principal dwelling.

Chandrekant Doulat (Ken), Surendra Doulat (Kalinie


1 Riva Ridge Drive


Plan 43M1630, Lot 213, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a combined gross floor area of 50.52 square metre (543.79 square foot) for two (2) accessory structures, whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metre (215.27 square foot) for two (2) accessory structures; 
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing gazebo, relocated) having a gross floor area of 22.23 square metre (239.28 square foot), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metre (161.45 square foot) for an individual accessory structure;
  3. To permit an accessory structure (proposed golf simulator) having a gross floor area of 28.29 square metre (304.51 square foot), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metre (161.45 square foot) for an individual accessory structure; and
  4. To permit an accessory structure (proposed golf simulator) having a height of 4.5 metre (14’-9”), whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres in all other residential zones.

Sonia Takhar


8 Dunegrass Way


Plan 43M1713, Lot 137, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and 
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.59 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

Lovepreet Singh, Gurpreet Kaur


34 Creekwood Drive


Plan M1202, Lot 52, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.57 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.00 metres. 

Mayfield Commercial Centre Ltd. 


6101-6261 Mayfield Road


Toronto Gore Con 7 North Division, Part Lot 17, Plan TG2, Part Lot 9, RP 43R31495, Part 2 Part, Part 1, RP 43R38518, Part 2, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a Commercial, Technical or Recreational School, whereas the by-law does not permit the use.

Yogang Pandya, Charmy Kantawala


6 Dunn Place 


Plan 742, Lot 179, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.33 metres to the proposed steps & landing for an existing above grade side entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9 metres to any steps (or landing) in the interior side yard.

Sumit Khurana, Kajal Kiran Khurana


24 Peak Drive 


Plan 43M2087, Lot 189, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.11 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Narinder Singh, Rajwinder Kaur, Harpreet Kaur


130 Fandango Drive


Plan 43M1720, Part Lot 330, RP 43R31813, Part 147, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard; and 
  2. To permit an proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.83 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

Tarun Ahlawat, Manju Kumari


1 Tennant Drive 


Plan 43M1691, Lot 103, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.73 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

Sukhdeep Kaur


152 Clover Bloom Road


Plan M1114, Part Lot 72, RP 43R20430, Part 15, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a quattroplex, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in a quattroplex;
  2. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below grade in the required interior side yard;
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.48 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 3.5 metres; and 
  4. To permit an additional residential unit in a quattroplex, whereas the by-law only permits an additional residential unit in a single detached, semi-detached or townhouse dwelling.

Syed Ali Badshah Naqvi, Zahira Naqvi


97 Antibes Drive


Plan 43M1950, Lot 18, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed above grade entrance in a side yard having a minimum width of 0.67 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door, whereas the by-law permits an above grade entrance when the side yard within which the door is located has a minimum width of 1.2 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door; 
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a setback of 0.12 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line;
  3. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a setback of 0.15 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  4. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a height of 3.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres in all other Residential zones; and 
  5. To permit an existing open, roofed structure in the interior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit an open, roofed structure in the interior side yard. 

Ashiah Rathore, Raminder Pal Singh Rathore, Santosh Rathore


107 Eastbrook Way 


Plan 43M-1712, Lot 56, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; 
  2. To permit a 0.3 metre side yard setback to a proposed exterior stairway leading to below grade entrance in the required interior side yard, resulting in a combined side yard width of 0.91 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 0.6 metres provided that the combined total for both side yards on an interior lot is not less than 1.8 metres; 
  3. To permit a proposed open, roofed structure in the interior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit an open, roofed structure in the interior side yard; and  
  4. To permit a 0.30 metre side yard setback to a proposed open, roofed structure in the required interior side yard, resulting in a combined side yard width of 0.91 metre, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 0.6 metre provided that the combined total for both side yards on an interior lot is 1.8 metre.

Nitin Balyan, Saloni Sharma


52 Commodore Drive


Plan 43M1751, Part Lot 234, RP 43R32309, Part 11, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard;  and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.09 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback 1.2 metres.

Sobha Dulai


6 Mirabell Court


Plan M776, Lot 5, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling; and
  3. To permit a 0.9 metres wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit.

Harjot Singh, Nitika Kalia


81 Drake Blvd. 


Plan 809, Part Lot 167, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 2.06 metres to an proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 3 metres; and
  3. To permit a 0.83 metres wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit.

Shaganpreet Singh


116 Starhill Crescent


Plan M1403, Part Lot 121, RP 43R25441, Part 6, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.3 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Peter Esambi Sone


20 Bucksaw Street


Plan 43M1993, Lot 70, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.064 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

1515820 Ontario Inc. 


22-171 Advance Blvd. 


Peel Condo Plan 299, Level 1, Unit 22, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow 358 parking spaces to be provided on site, whereas the by-law requires 375 parking spaces to be provided on site.

2538821 Ontario Inc.


115 East Drive, Unit 1, 2, 3 and 5


Plan 720, Block D, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a place of amusement (golf simulator) whereas the by-law does not permit the use;
  2. To permit a restaurant whereas the by-law does not permit the use;
  3. To permit a motor vehicle sales establishment whereas the by-law does not permit the use;
  4. To permit outside storage of display vehicles associated with the motor vehicles sales establishment to be located in the front yard whereas the by-law does not permit outside storage in the front yard; 
  5. To permit fencing in the front yard, whereas the by-law does not permit fencing in the front yard; and
  6. To allow a 1.5 metres wide landscape open space strip abutting a street, except at approved driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a 3 metres wide landscape open space strip abutting a street, except at approved driveway locations.

Violet Okunmgbowa-Ikponmwosa


35 Brookview Road


Plan M416, Lot 127, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 11.10 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres.

Kulwinder Singh, Kamaljit Kang


21 Estateview Circle


Plan M440, Lot 19, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a detached garage having a gross floor area of 222.96 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a detached garage having a maximum gross floor area of 48 square metres;
  2. To permit a vehicle garage door height of 3.05 metres for the proposed detached garage, whereas the by-law permits a maximum vehicle garage door height of 2.4 metres for a detached garage; 
  3. To permit a detached garage having a building height of 6.75 metres for a flat roof, whereas the by-law permits a detached garage having a height of 3.5 metres in the case of a flat roof;
  4. To permit a detached garage on the lot with an existing attached garage on the lot, whereas the by-law does not permit an attached garage and detached garage on the lot; and 
  5. To permit oversized motor vehicles (tractors, including attachments), whereas the by-law does not permit oversized motor vehicles. 

Norma Jasodya Manohar


42 Beckenham Road


Plan 43M1678, Lot 318, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 5.62 metres to an existing sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; 
  2. To permit an existing open roof porch to encroach 3.63 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 3.87 metres from the open roof porch to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits an open roof porch to encroach a maximum 2.0 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a required setback of 5.5 metres from the open roof porch to the rear lot line;
  3. To permit a driveway width of 7.51 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7 metres; and
  4. To permit 0.4 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

2599157 Ontario Inc. 


3 Walker Drive


Plan 43M643, Part Block 6, RP 43R40702, Parts 2 to 10, 12 to 19, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 2 metre wide landscape open space strip along Walker Drive and Torbram Drive, except at approved driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 3 metres wide landscape open space strip along any lot line abutting a street, except at approved driveway locations.

A&V Cavallo Investments Ltd. c/o Anthony Cipriani


180 Bovaird Drive West


Con 1, WHS Part Lot 11, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit motor vehicles sales establishment with accessory Office, Motor vehicle repair shop and motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing), whereas the by-law does not permit the use; 
  2. To allow 165 parking spaces on site, whereas the by-law requires 171 parking spaces;  and
  3. To permit 0 car stacking spaces for the motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing), whereas the by-law requires 10 car stacking spaces for the motor vehicle washing establishment (detailing).

(See item 7.2)

Emmanuel Jude Agbonifo, Ugiomo Agbonifo


21 Banting Crescent


Plan M295, Part Lot 247, RP 43R8241, Part 5, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a 0.74 metres wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit.

Thangrasa Kirubakaran, Kirubakaran Dilani


24 Caboose Street 


Plan 43M2054, Block 76, Plan 43M2058, Block 402, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a 0.62 metres setback to an existing building addition (open, roofed porch), whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 4.5 metres for open roofed porches and or uncovered terraces.

Paramjit Singh Nirwan, Paramjeet Kaur Nirwan


9 Rae Avenue 


Plan M322, Lot 23, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed detached garage having a height of 6.76 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum height of 3.5 metres in the case of a flat roof.

2537079 Ontario Inc. 


11499 The Gore Road


Toronto Gore Con 10, ND Part Lot 16, RP43R38334, Part 4, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow a lot coverage of 28.5%, whereas the by-law permits a lot coverage of 25%; and
  2. To allow 57 parking spaces to be provided on-site for a temporary period of 5 years, whereas the by-law requires 61 parking spaces to be provided on-site.

CAPREIT Limited Partnership c/o Ben McCauley


3 Knightsbridge Road


Plan 962, Block D and 3-11 Knightsbridge Road, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule ‘C’ - Section 149 of the by-law to permit 310 units in Building A, whereas the by-law permits Building A a maximum of 308 dwelling units in accordance to Schedule ‘C’ - Section 149 of the by-law.

Christine Haye-Callaghan


70 Commodore Drive


Plan M1751, Lot 229L, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.29 metres to the exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres. 

Deferred from December 10, 2024

Swaran Singh


4 Maple Avenue


Plan BR 2 Part Lots 17, 18, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 1), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.56 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres to nearest lot line;
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 2), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.31 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres to nearest lot line; 
  3. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 2), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.32 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres to nearest lot line; 
  4. To permit a combined gross floor area of 20.44 square metres (220 square foot) for two (2) accessory structures (existing sheds), whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; 
  5. To permit a driveway width of 10.37 metres (34 feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and
  6. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting both side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot lines.

Deferred from July 16, 2024 and November 12, 2024

Susanne Roslyn George, Rudolph Elliot George


57 Creditstone Road


Plan M829, Lot 34. Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.7 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7 metres.

Deferred from September 12, 2024 and December 10, 2024

Parminder Bath, Hartaran Kaur Bath


36 Love Court


Plan 1996, Lot 17, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.41 metres, whereas by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0.0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas by-law requires a minimum 0.6m of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from December 10, 2024

Sajjid Mohammed, Arshia Parveen


28 Clarence Street


Con 1 EHS, Part Lot 4, Ward 3


Deferred from January 28, 2025


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow an interior side yard setback to a Garden suite of 1.12 metres, whereas the by-law requires an interior side yard setback of 1.8 metres;
  2. To permit 2 parking spaces to be provided on-site, whereas the by-law requires 3 parking spaces to be provided on-site; and
  3. To permit a building separation distance from the garden suite to the principal dwelling of 2.13 metres, whereas the by-law requires a building separation distance from the garden suite to the principal dwelling of 3 metres.

Next Scheduled Meeting:  March 25, 2025

No Item Selected