Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Ron Chatha (Chair)
  • Desiree Doerfler (Vice-Chair)
  • Ana Cristina Marques
  • David Colp

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.


NOTICE: In-person public attendance at the meeting may be limited due to prevailing public health gathering requirements. Public and other meeting participants are encouraged to observe meetings online or participate remotely by contacting the City Clerk’s Office through the contact details below.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:
Jeanie Myers, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, cityclerksoffice@brampton.ca


Letter dated August 24, 2022 from Kuldip Tutt, owner of the property advising that applications B-2022-0001 & A-2022-0030 for 53 Royce Avenue are withdrawn.


Letter received September 09, 2022 from Dilpreet Singh, RDA Designs, requesting a deferral for application A-2022-0261 (Agenda Item 8.15).


Letter dated September 12, 2022 from Elen Abunahla, Antara Design, requesting a deferral for application A-2022-0264 (Agenda Item 8.17).

1388688 ONTARIO LIMITED


499 MAIN STREET SOUTH


PART OF LOT 1, CONCESSION 1 WHS, WARD 3


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 22.1 hectares (54.61 acres); together with servicing and access easements over the existing driveway.  The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 55 metres (180.45 feet), a depth of approximately 127 metres (416.67 feet) and an area of approximately 0.65 hectares (1.61 acres).  The effect of the application is to create a new lot to facilitate development of the first phase (Phase 1A) of the redevelopment of the Shopper’s World site

ALEXANDRE RODRIGUES AND MARIA REGINA RODRIGUES


168 KENNEDY ROAD SOUTH, UNIT 9


PART OF LOT 2 CONCESSION 2 EHS, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a convenience store with take out (Unit 9) beyond 50 metres from the front lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a convenience store with take out that is located more than 50 metres from the front lot line;
  2. To provide 142 parking spaces whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 223 parking spaces.

TARIQ FAROOQ AND GULZAR BEGUM


96 SAL CIRCLE


LOT 70, PLAN M-1030, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the front lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the front lot line;
  2. To permit a driveway width of 8.15m (26.74 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  3. To permit 0.25m (0.82 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line.

JACK SZYDLOWSKI AND JOHANNA SZYDLOWSKI


6 BIRD AVENUE


LOT BLOCK A, PLAN BR-24, WARD 1


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a roof to encroach 6.04m (19.82 ft.) into the rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 1.46m (4.80 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a roof to encroach a maximum of 2.0m (6.56 ft.), resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.5m (18.04 ft.).

SANDEEP SODHI AND GURDEEP SINGH SADHRA


41 TOTTEN DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK 360, PLAN 43M-1731, PARTS 26 AND 27, PLAN 43R-31750, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.23m (0.75 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94).

HARSHAL SANATKUMAR SONI AND HIRAL SHAILESH SONI


39 HAWTREY ROAD


LOT 222, PLAN 43M-2058, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a deck with a rear yard setback of 2.69m (8.83 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 3.5m (11.48 ft.).

SUKHBIR KAUR AND HARPAL SINGH


209 VAN SCOTT DRIVE


LOT 217, PLAN M-1426, WARD 2


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a landing and associated steps for an above grade entrance with a side yard setback of 0.31m (1.02 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9m (2.95 ft.) for any steps or landing associated with an above-grade entrance from the side lot line;
  2. To permit a driveway width of 7.47m (24.51 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  3. To permit 0.10m (0.33 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line.

CARLOS PEREIRA


91 HAROLD STREET


LOT 21, PLAN 515, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To provide a 2.16m (7.09 ft.) rear yard setback to a proposed 2 storey addition whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.62m (25 ft.) {25% of the depth of the lot};
  2. To permit a driveway width of 8.17m (26.80 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.), or the width of the garage, whichever is greater, for a driveway on the flankage lot line;
  3. To permit an accessory structure (existing gazebo) in the front yard whereas the by-law prohibits accessory structures in the front yard;
  4. To permit an existing fence in the front yard having a maximum height 1.78m (5.84 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum height of 1.0m (3.28 ft.) for a fence in the front yard.
  5. To permit an existing fence in the visibility triangle having a maximum height of 1.78m (5.84 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum fence height of 0.8m (2.62 ft.) in the visibility triangle.

ANDREA CARNEIRO AND STEVE MACEDO


584 QUEEN MARY DRIVE


LOT 4, PLAN 43M-2090, WARD 6


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (cabana) to include a habitable floor area (installation of washroom) whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structurer to be used for human habitation.

SANDEEP SANDHU AND VALENTINA PRABHJOT KAUR SANDHU


23 HOYLE DRIVE


LOT 38, PLAN 43M-1582, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 0.0m of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) wide permeable landscape strip abutting the side lot line;
  2. To permit a 0.93m (3.05 ft.) path of travel leading to a principle entrance for a second unit whereas the by-law requires a minimum unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance for a second unit.

PARTHEEPAN DITHENUKA, ARIYARANTNAM PARTHEEPAN, PARTHEEPAN KOMATHY AND JASINGAM AGENNITH


4 HENRY MOODY DRIVE


LOT 49, PLAN 43M-2054, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an above grade door in the side wall where a minimum side yard width of 0.67m (2.20 ft.) is provided extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door, whereas the by-law does not permit a door in the side wall unless there is a minimum side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door;
  2. To permit a 0.67m (2.20 ft.) path of travel leading to a principle entrance for a second unit whereas the by-law requires a minimum unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance for a second unit.

GURPREET SINGH AND NEHA KALSI


4 JEMIMA ROAD


LOT 123, PLAN 43M-2022, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit stairways constructed below established grade within a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.09m (0.30 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard of 1.2m (3.94 ft.);
  3. To permit a rear yard setback of 2.06m (6.76 ft.) for a deck off the main floor whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 3.5m (11.48 ft.) to a wood deck off the main floor.

GAITRIE CHETRAM AND GAUTAM CHETRAM


52 MIRABELL COURT


LOT 28, PLAN M-776, WARD 3


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade side entrance within a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit stairways constructed below established grade within a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.05m (0.16 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard of 1.2m (3.94 ft.);
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.46m (1.51 ft.) to an existing accessory structure whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to the nearest lot lines for an accessory structure;
  4. To permit a driveway width of 5.9m (19.36 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 5.2m (17.06 ft.).

MUKESH MALIK AND RATAN MALIK


616 QUEEN MARY DRIVE


LOT 42, PLAN 43M-2090, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line.

CHARANDAI SARJOO


78 MILLHOUSE MEWS


PART OF BLOCK 172, PLAN 43M-1532, PARTS 49, 50, PLAN 43R-27794, WARD 6


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.59m (1.94 ft.) to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

JASVINDER SHOKER


112 MOUNTAINBERRY ROAD


LOT 175, PLAN M-1303, WARD 10


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.31m (27.26 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.).

SUKDEV SINGH AND KULVIR KAUR


10 KIRK DRIVE


LOT 175, PLAN 43M-817, WARD 5


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.58m (24.87 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  2. To permit a roof to encroach 3.54m (11.61 ft.) into the minimum required rear yard setback, resulting in a rear yard setback of 4.34m (14.24 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum roof encroachment of 2m (6.56 ft.) into the minimum required rear yard setback, resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.88 m (19.29 ft.);
  3. To permit lot coverage of 37% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

GURPREET UBHI AND KULJEET UBHI


8884 CREDITVIEW ROAD


PART OF LOT 5, CONCESSION 4 WHS, WARD 4


The applicants are proposing construction of a 2 storey dwelling and are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit interior side yard setbacks of 2.66m (8.73 ft.) and 2.89m (9.48 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.);
  2. To permit 56% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space whereas the by-law requires a minimum 70% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space.

RAY GUNNESS AND MELANIE GUNNESS


22 NEWBRIDGE CRESCENT


PART OF LOT 61, PLAN M-338, PART 11, PLAN 43R-10806, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a 1.02m (3.47 ft.) path of travel leading to a principle entrance for a second unit whereas the by-law requires a minimum unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance for a second unit.

DANIAL SALEEM ALAMI AND TALAL SALEEM ALMANI


92 ABBOTSBURY DRIVE


PART OF LOT 36, PLAN 43M-1751, PART 2, PLAN 43R-32308, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 1.33m (4.36 ft.) to a proposed below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0m (9.84 ft.);
  3. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) to be located in an exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure to be located in an exterior side yard;
  4. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) having setbacks of 0.21m (0.69 ft.) and 0.30m (0.98 ft.) to the nearest property lines whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) for an accessory structure to the nearest property lines.

GURDEEP SINGH LAKHESAR AND NIDHI KHATTAR


66 ENCLAVE TRAIL


LOT 9, PLAN 43M-2060, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a parking space depth of 4.28m (14.04 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4m (17.72 ft.).

MOHAMMED ILYAS


2257 AND 2267 EMBLETON ROAD


PART OF LOT 5, CONCESSION 5 WHS, WARD 6


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a Day Nursery whereas the by-law dos not permit the proposed use;
  2. To permit 40% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space whereas the by-law requires a minimum 70% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space;
  3. To permit a front yard setback of 8.0m (22.25 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 12m.0m (39.37 ft.);
  4. To permit a side yard setback of 6.0m (19.68 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.);
  5. To permit a building height of 12.0m 39.37 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 10.0m (32.80 ft.).

STEVEN ALLIN AND MARY ANN ALLIN


11 ALEXANDER STREET


PART OF LOT 110, PLAN BR-2, PART 1, PLAN 43R-20649, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 11.21m (36.78 ft.) whereas a minimum rear yard setback of 25% of the lot depth is required resulting in a minimum rear yard setback of 11.36m (37.27 ft.);
  2. To permit lot coverage of 36% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

ALOK GOYAL AND MANISHA GOYAL


28 ANGELGATE ROAD


LOT 371, PLAN 43M-1883, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a deck to encroach 2.43m (7.97 ft.) into a required rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.07m (16.63 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum deck encroachment of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) into a required rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.7m (18.70 ft.).

AJAY KUMAR AND TARUNA KUMAR


81 DAIRYMAID ROAD


LOT 10, PLAN 43M-2088, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law prohibits below grade entrances between the main wall of a dwelling and a flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 4.07m (13.35 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5m (14.76 ft.).

VIKRAM SURAVARAPU, RASHIDA NARAHARA SETTI AND SWETHA SALIAN


44 RIBBON DRIVE


LOT 27, PLAN 43M-1262, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law prohibits below grade entrances between the main wall of a dwelling and a flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0m (9.84 ft.);
  3. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) to be located in the exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure to be located in an exterior side yard;
  4. To permit 0.0m of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side line whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line.
  5. To permit a 3.75m (12.30 ft.) separation distance between a driveway and the point of intersection of two streets whereas the by-law requires a minimum 5.0m (16.40 ft.) separation distance between a driveway and projected point of intersection of two streets.

ADMINS BRAMPTON INVESTMENT CORP


17 BRAMALEA ROAD


BLOCK E, PLAN 720, WARD 7


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a commercial, technical or recreational school in Building B (2,018 sq. m building) whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use;
  2. To permit 374 parking spaces on site whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 387 parking spaces.

PARTH SHAH AND SNEHA PANCHAL


47 BRAMFIELD STREET


PART OF BLOCK 468, PLAN 43M-1504, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a parking space depth of 5.23m (17.16 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4m (17.72 ft.);
  2. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) to be located in an exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure in an exterior side yard.

RANJI BISSESSAR AND SONYA DHANJAL


39 GUEST STREET


PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, PLAN BR-31, WARD 3


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an easterly side yard setback of 0.89m (2.92 ft.) to the first storey whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to the first storey where the lot width is less than or equal to 16 metres;
  2. To permit a westerly side yard setback of 1.31m (4.30 ft.) and an easterly side yard setback of 1.12m (3.67 ft.) to the second storey whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) where the lot width is less than or equal to 16 metres; 
  3. To permit a maximum building height of 9.04m (26.66 ft.) to the mid point of the roof whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 8.5m (27.90 ft.) to the mid point of the roof;
  4. To permit a maximum lot coverage of 35.4% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%;

METRUS (TERRA) PROPERTIES INC.


18 KENVIEW BOULEVARD


PART OF BLOCK 3, PLAN 43M-811, WARD 8

  1. To permit all uses permitted in the M1 zone and associated parking on lands zoned HC2-2686 whereas the by-law does not permit the uses on lands zoned HC2-2686;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 22.80m abutting Steeles Avenue whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 32.0m abutting Steeles Avenue;
  3. To permit a 1.55m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Steeles Avenue, except at approved driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 9.0m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Steeles Avenue, except at approved driveway locations;
  4. To permit a 4.35m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Kenview Boulevard except at approved driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 4.5m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Kenview Boulevard, except at approved driveway locations;
  5. To permit a 0.0m landscaped open space abutting the rear lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 3.0m wide continuous landscaped strip abutting the rear lot line;
  6. To permit a 4.05m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Catstleview Drive and Daylight Triangle, except at driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 6.0m wide landscaped open space strip be provided along the 0.3m reserves except at driveway locations;
  7. To permit a 1.55m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Steeles Ave, except at driveway locations, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 6.0m wide landscaped open space strip be provided along the 0.3m reserves except at driveway locations;
  8. To permit a 4.05m wide landscaped open space strip abutting Castleview Drive and Daylight Triangle, except at driveway locations, whereas the by law requires a minimum 9.0m wide landscaped open space strip be provided along the 0.3m reserves except at driveway locations;
  9. To provide 132 parking spaces on site whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 146 parking spaces.
No Item Selected