Items 10.2.1, 10.4.2 and 10.4.3 were brought forward and dealt with at this time.
Divya Arora and Lajanthan Prabaharan, Board Members and Political Advocacy Team Representatives, Community Climate Council, provided a presentation which included information on the following:
- Lack of public support for Option #1 (widening Williams Parkway to six lanes)
- Support for Option #3, which aligns with the Active Transportation Master Plan (ATMP), 2040 Vision, Community Energy and Emissions Reduction Plan (CEERP) and Council's priorities
- Alternative solutions for improving traffic control/congestion
- Characteristics of the surrounding residential area
- Reallocating project funds to improve public transit (e.g. Queen Street BRT)
Gideon Forman, Climate Change and Transportation Policy Analyst, David Suzuki Foundation, spoke against Option #1 in the staff report, noting that widening Williams Parkway to six lanes will create induced demand and increase traffic congestion. He added that residents do not support Option #1 and this option does not align with the 2040 Vision and CEERP, where active transportation is a priority. He encouraged Committee to select one of the 4-lane options, which enhances active transportation, is more cost effective and improves health and air quality.
Sylvia Roberts, Brampton Resident, expressed support for Option #3 and highlighted the need for separate bicycle facilities, noting that e-bikes are increasingly popular and can pose a danger on shared paths with pedestrians.
Dayle Laing, Secretary, BikeBrampton, highlighted the lack of public support for Option #1, and outlined BikeBrampton's position on Options 2-4, noting that Option #3 is the preferred choice as it aligns with the 2040 Vision, ATMP and CEERP. She sought clarification with respect to the construction of noise walls in Options 2-4 and advised that trees should be preserved and planted where possible. In addition, Ms. Laing outlined the need for more sustainable modes of transportation to address the climate emergency.
Pauline Thornham, Co-Chair, Brampton Cycling Advisory Committee (BCAC), provided a video delegation, which was played during the meeting. Ms. Thornham highlighted progress made through the implementation of bike lanes, which will help to improve health, reduce pollution and reduce traffic congestion. She acknowledged the results of the public survey, which indicates that most residents do not support Option #1, outlined the need to improve the quality of life for residents in this community, and outlined the BCAC's support for Option #3.
Committee discussion on this matter included the following:
- Public engagement on the Williams Parkway Review and Public Survey responses
- Most residents were not in support of Option #1 (widening Williams Parkway to six lanes)
- Greenery and landscaping were highlighted as a priority
- Timeline for updating the TMP to incorporate elements of the CEERP (including GHG targets), active transportation and address induced demand
Staff responded to questions from Committee with respect to the possibility of amending Option #4 to include:
- the planting of trees and enhanced landscaping
- that staff work with the Region of Peel to find opportunities for implementing multi-use pathways
- the continuation of the construction of noise walls along Williams Parkway, where desired by residents
Further Committee discussion included the following:
- Funding for noise walls that are constructed without road widening
- Funding opportunities from the Province for active transportation projects
- Clarification from staff regarding why laybys for transit buses will not be incorporated in future road designs
- Possibility of implementing active transportation facilities on Franceschini Bridge over Highway 410
- The need for more greenery, landscaping and multi-use paths in this area to encourage more active transportation
- Request that the delegations' submissions and public survey be a consideration for other road widening projects citywide, if applicable
- The need to review and report back on the reallocation of funds for this project, possible reimbursement of development charges, and funding options for the construction of noise walls without road widening
- The need to review and determine if development charges can be applied to active transportation projects
The following motion was considered.