Items 6.5 and 11.1 were brought forward and dealt with at this time.
Nicole Hanson, Planner, Planning, Building and Growth Management, presented an overview of the application that included location of the subject lands, area context, development proposal, planning framework summary, current planning context of the official plan, secondary plan, zoning by-law, proposed zoning by-law amendment, issues and considerations.
Richard Domes, Planner, Gagnon Walker Domes presented an overview of the application that included subject site, street view, context, Hurontario Street LRT line, built form context, regional intensification corridor, Hurontario Street and Main Street corridor Secondary plan, master plan summary, mixed use, transitions, setbacks and separations, landscape concept plan, phasing, and preliminary renderings.
Mansoor Kazerouni, Global Director, IBI Group, presented an overview of the application that included Turtlecreek Boulevard. to Hurontario Street walking space, front entrance and access ramps locations, Hurontario Street frontage consist with retail and patios, townhomes facing the residential complex, and the location of the smaller buildings on Turtlecreek Boulevard.
The following additional persons delegated at Committee, in addition to the registered delegations under item 6.5:
5. Les Molnar, Brampton Resident
6. Huyen Ung, Business Owner
7. Adam Chow, Business Owner
8. Stephan Baer, Brampton Resident
9. Jennifer Clarke, Brampton Resident
10. Pankaj Kushalkar, Brampton Resident
11. Pooram Ramjit, Brampton Resident
Committee consideration of the matter included concerns from the residents with respect to following:
- traffic studies not reflecting the potential for increased traffic with development in the area
- LRT replacing local buses to travel anywhere other then along Hurontario Street
- safety concerns
- existing home values will be decreased
- impact on residents and business owners in the area
- parking spots, residential streets to support shortage
- congestion on the roadways
- privacy for residential residents
- 45 angular degree plane inconsistent with all buildings
- height of the buildings
- noise level during construction
- insufficient hospitals and schools to support proposed density
- sewer and water sustainability
The following motion was considered.