Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Ron Chatha (Chair)
  • Desiree Doerfler (Vice-Chair)
  • Ana Cristina Marques
  • David Colp
  • Rod Power

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

NOTICE: In-person public attendance at the meeting may be limited due to prevailing public health gathering requirements. Public and other meeting participants are encouraged to observe meetings online or participate remotely by contacting the City Clerk’s Office through the contact details below.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:
Jeanie Myers, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, [email protected]


Letter dated June 30, 2022 from Mark Deltin, Figaro Construction Inc., owner of the property advising that application A-2022-0040 for 1 Copperfield Road is withdrawn.


Letter dated July 7, 2022 from David Waters, Weston Consulting, requesting a deferral of application A-2022-0168 (Agenda Item 8.2) to the August 2, 2022 Committee of Adjustment hearing.

MEDTRONIC CANADA INC.


99 HEREFORD STREET


PART OF BLOCK 3, PLAN 43M-1673, WARD 6


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 4.18 hectares (10.32 acres).   The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 65 metres (213.25 feet), a depth of approximately 243 metres (797.24 feet) and an area of approximately 1.619 hectares (4 acres). The effect of the application is to establish two (2) separate lots from the existing lot to facilitate separate ownership. The existing 3-storey building on the southerly lot will remain.  Future development of the newly created northerly lot for employment use is proposed.

JASWINDER SINGH KHOSA


69 NEWPORT STREET


LOT 72, PLAN M-641, WARD 7


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.7m (25.26 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  2. To permit 0.38m (1.25 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) wide permeable landscape strip adjacent to the side lot line.

ACUMEN BRAMPTON INC.


21 COVENTRY ROAD


PART OF BLOCK E, PLAN 977, PARTS 1, 2, PLAN, 43R-12163, WARD 8


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s): 

  1. To permit a commercial school whereas the by-law does not permit a commercial school;
  2. To provide 48 parking spaces whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 158 parking spaces.

MICHELE PANNOZZO AND GISELE ZANNELLA


12 CATHCART CRESCENT


LOT 38, PART OF BLOCK  C, PLAN 767, WARD 7


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.07m (0.23 ft.) to an existing carport whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 3.0m (9.84 ft.);
  2. To permit lot coverage of 45% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

PUNIA CHANDER SUBHASH


10 KENNY COURT


LOT 24, PLAN M-1002, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a building height of 12.73m (41.76 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 10.6m (34.78 ft.);
  2. To permit a fence height of 3.0m (9.84 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum fence height of 1m (3.28 ft.) in the required front yard and 2m (6.56 ft.) in other yards;
  3. To permit both an attached garage and a detached garage on a lot whereas by-law only permits a detached garage where there is no attached garage on the lot; 
  4. To permit a detached garage with a gross floor area of 56 sq. m (602.78 sq. ft.), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 48 sm. (516.67 sq. ft.) for a detached garage;
  5. To permit a maximum garage door height of 3.07m (10.07 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum garage door height of 2.4m (7.87 ft.);
  6. To permit an individual accessory structure (cabana) with a gross floor area of 61 sq. m (172.22 sq. ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 20 sq. m (215.28 sq. ft.) for an individual accessory structure.

MANTHAN SHUKLA AND MUDRA THAKAR


65 BENHURST CRESCENT


PART OF BLOCK B, PLAN 43M-2043, PARTS 19 AND 20, PLAN 43R-38453, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (gazebo) to be located in the exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure in the exterior side yard.

KEWAL SINGH AND RUPINDER GHOMAN


12 RAE AVENUE


LOT 33, PLAN M-322, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a building height of 15.875m (52.08 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 10.6m (34.78 ft.);
  2. To permit 63.87% of the front yard to be landscaped open space whereas the by-law requires a minimum 70% of the front yard to be landscaped open space;
  3. To permit a garage door height of 3.05m (10 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum garage door height of 2.4m (7.87 ft.).

AMANDEEP SINGH GILL AND HARPREET KAUR GILL


56 JAY STREET


LOT 39, PLAN M-763, WARD 2


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit the total width of both side yards on the lot to be 1.13m (3.71 ft.) whereas the by-law requires the total width of both side yards on the lot to be a minimum of 1.8m (5.91 ft.);
  2. To permit a door on the side wall of a dwelling where the distance between the walls of the two dwellings is 2.34m (7.68 ft.) whereas the by-law does not permit a door on the side wall where the distance between the walls of two dwellings is less than 2.4m (7.88 ft.);
  3. To permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance within a required interior side yard;
  4. To permit a 1.11m (3.64 ft.) path of travel leading to a principle entrance for a second unit whereas the by-law requires a minimum unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance for a second unit.

MANETT RESIDENCES INC.


100 MANETT CRESCENT


BLOCK 19, PLAN 43M-1348, WARD 5


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 2.4m (7.87 ft.) to a hydro transformer whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 15.0m (49.21 ft.) to all lot lines.

PIRATHEEBAN RANENDRARAJAH


29 LANGSTON DRIVE


PART OF LOTS 180 AND 181, PLAN M-303, PARTS 32 AND 64, PLAN 43R-10219, WARD 9


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing below grade entrance in a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit a 0.98m (3.22 ft.) side yard setback to an existing below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

KAMALJIT KAUR


11 ATTMAR DRIVE


LOT 25, PLAN 43M-1709, WARD 8


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.83m (29 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  2. To permit 0.0m of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) wide permeable landscape strip adjacent to the side lot line.

NAVDEEP GHUMAN


37 HUBBELL ROAD


PART OF LOT 130, PLAN 43M-2052, PART 10, PLAN 43R-38446, WARD 6


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a parking space depth of 4.91m (16.10 ft.) to facilitate a curb cut whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4m (17.72 ft.).

KARAMJEET SINGH AND RAMANDEEP KAUR AUJLA


56 BARR CRESCENT


LOT 16, PLAN M-537, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard depth of 2.60m (8.53 ft.) to a proposed below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard depth of 3.0m (9.84 ft.).

PRADEEP SATHYASEELAN AND SIMI VATTATHARA LOHITH


13 TUNDRA SWAN ROAD


PART OF BLOCK 442, PLAN 43M-1667, PARTS 7 AND 8, PLAN 43R-30470, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit a 0.85m (2.79 ft.) setback to an existing below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

ADEOLA ADEYINKA OLOMOLA


26 HAYMARKET DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK 377, PLAN 43M-2058, PART 11, PLAN 43R-39007, WARD 6


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a two unit dwelling in a back-to back townhouse whereas the by-law does defines a two unit dwelling as a single detached, semi-detached or townhouse dwelling which contains a second unit. 

901580 ONTARIO LTD.


5981 MAYFIELD ROAD


PART OF LOT 17, CONCESSION 6 EHS, WARD 10


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule C - Section 213 of the by-law to permit parking and drive-through stacking lanes in an area identified as required landscaping whereas the by-law requires compliance with Schedule C-Section 213 of the by-law;
  2. To vary Schedule C - Section 213 of the by-law to allow landscaping in areas identified as parking whereas the by-law requires compliance with Schedule C-Section 213 of the by-law;
  3. To vary Schedule C - Section 213 of the by-law to permit a total of 34 parking spaces whereas Schedule C – Section 213 identifies a total of 47 parking spaces to be provided.

GOBBATO GROUP INC. 


16 WEST STREET


LOT 19, PLAN BR-4, WARD 1


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 0.0m of permeable landscaping adjacent to both side lot lines whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) permeable landscape strip adjacent to both side lot lines;
  2. To permit a 1.22m (4.0 ft.) interior side yard setback to the second storey whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) to the second storey;
  3. To permit a lot width of 19.24 metres for a double duplex dwelling whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 20 metres to allow for a double duplex dwelling;
  4. To provide six parking spaces whereas the by law requires a minimum of 8 parking spaces;
  5. To permit parking in the rear yard whereas the by-law does not permit parking in the rear yard;
  6. To permit a parking aisle having an irregular aisle width corresponding with the angle of the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width of 6.6m.

TARLOCHAN SINGH AND KULWINDER SINGH


41 SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD


LOT 399, PLAN 43M-1613, WARD 1


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s): 

  1. To permit an existing driveway width of 7.02m (23.03 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.).
No Item Selected