Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Ron Chatha
  • Jarmanjit Singh Dehriwal
  • Sukhpal Khaira
  • Baljit Mand
  • James Reed
  • Sarbjeet Saini
  • Jotvinder Sodhi
  • Thisaliny Thirunavukkarasu
  • Manoharan Vaithianathan

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:
Jeanie Myers, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, [email protected]


Letter dated June 1, 2023, from Manupriya Sharma, applicant and owner of the property advising that Applications B-2022-0003, A-2022-0047 and A-2022-0048 for the property municipally known as 43 David Street are Withdrawn.


Letter dated June 12, 2023, from Shivang Tarika, Rely Solution, requesting a deferral for application A-2023-0056 (Agenda Item 9.3).


Letter dated June 13, 2023, from Sebastian Alzamora, Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc., requesting a deferral for application A-2022-0022 (Agenda Item 9.1).


Letter dated June 16, 2023, from Tanvir Rai, Noble Prime Solutions Ltd, requesting a deferral for application A-2023-0164 (Agenda Item 8.19).


Letter dated June 16, 2023, from Tanvir Rai, Noble Prime Solutions Ltd, advising that application A-2023-0166 is withdrawn (Agenda Item 8.21).

SUKHJEEVAN CHATTHA


18 BEAMISH COURT


PART OF LOT 2, PLAN 1002, WARD 10


The purpose of the application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to the grant of an easement having a width of approximately 2.0 metres (6.56 feet) and an area of approximately 239.4 square metres (0.06 acres). It is proposed that a servicing easement (sanitary sewer) be established in favour of the abutting property to the west municipally known as 16 Beamish Court.

DANIELS CHOICE MOUNT PLEASANT CORPORATION 


40 LAGERFELD DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK 4, PLAN 43M-1927, WARD 6


The purpose of the application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment for conveyance of Part of Block 4, Plan 43M-1927 to provide for a stratified lot addition of lands currently under ownership of the East Parcel (rental); to the West Parcel of land (future condominium). The effect of the application is to amend ownership boundaries by merging select Parts at grade and in the shared underground garage with the West Parcel of land municipally known as 10, 20 and 30 Lagerfeld Drive. (Concurrent Consent Application B-2023-0019).

DANIELS MPV CORPORATION


10, 20 AND 30 LAGERFELD DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK 4, PLAN 43M-1927, WARD 6


The purpose of the application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment for conveyance of Part of Block 4, Plan 43M-1927 to provide for a stratified lot addition of lands currently under ownership of the West Parcel (future condominium) to the East Parcel of land (rental). The effect of the application is to amend ownership boundaries by merging select Parts at grade and in the shared underground garage with the East Parcel of land municipally known as 40 Lagerfeld Drive. (Concurrent Consent Application B-2023-0018).

JOGINDER SINGH AND SUKHWINDER KAUR


4 BROAD OAK COURT


LOT 125, PLAN M-740, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance to be located in a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.0m to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

YIHUA SHI


34 MERGANSER CRESCENT


LOT 31, PLAN M-615, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in a required side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance to be located in a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.0m to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 0.3m (0.98 ft) provided the opposite side yard has a minimum setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.);
  3. To permit a 0.9m (2.95 ft) path of travel to the principal entrance leading to a second unit whereas the by-law requires an unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance to the second unit.

JASBIR KAUR, ARSHDEEP PANNU AND NAVNEET PANNU


6 BROOKDALE CRESCENT


LOT 201, PLAN 651, WARD 7 


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a building height of 8.41m (27.60 ft) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 7.6m (24.93 ft.);
  2. To permit a rear yard setback of 8m (26.25 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 8.38m (27.50 ft.);
  3. To permit a lot coverage of 34.94%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

 

TARLOCHAN SINGH AND GURWINDER KAUR SINGH


37 ESKER DRIVE


LOT 144, PLAN 537, WARD 2


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.9m (29.20 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  2. To permit 0.54m (1.77 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line.

NELSON UMANA AND FATIMA MORALES


62 GARSIDE CRESCENT


PART OF LOT 159, PLAN 866, WARD 8


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.72m (5.64 ft.) to the exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 3.0m (9.84 ft.);
  3. To permit an existing attached carport with an interior side yard setback of 0.46m (1.51 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft) to an attached carport;
  4. To permit a lot coverage of 34.98%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 33.3.

VAQAR HASAN AND MAHIRA VAQAR


43 KEMPSFORD CRESCENT


LOT 391, PLAN 43M-1986, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in a required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance to be located in a required interior side yard;
  2. To permit a 0.03m (0.098 ft.) interior side yard setback to a below grade entrance, with a combined side yard setback of 0.67m (2.20 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft) on one side provided that the combined total for both interior lots is 1.8m (5.91 ft.).

SANDEEP RAJ AND KAMLESH RAJ


96 TOBA CRESCENT


LOT 1, PLAN M-1051, WARD 2


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing above grade door in the side wall where a minimum side yard width of 1.00m (3.28 ft.) is provided extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door whereas the by-law does not permit a door in the side wall unless there is a minimum side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door;
  2. To permit a 1.00m (3.28 ft) path of travel leading to the primary entrance to a second unit whereas the by-law requires an unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance to the second unit.

SUVANSH MEHTA AND SHRUTI RAIBAGI


21 DANESBURY CRESCENT


LOT 272, PLAN 742, WARD 7


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the front lot line whereas the by-law does not permit below grade entrances between the main wall of the dwelling and the front lot line;
  2. To permit a front yard setback of 7.1m (23.30 ft) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.6m (24.93 ft);
  3. To permit an existing building addition (sunroom) with a rear yard setback of 5.2m (17.06 ft) whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.6m (24.93 ft).

RISHA RAM SHARMA


11575 DIXIE ROAD


PART OF LOT 17, CONCESSION 4 EHS, PART 3, PLAN 43R-39463, WARD 9


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a place of worship use whereas the by-law does not permit a place of worship in an Agricultural zone.

KISHORE NABIN LUINTEL AND SMEETA ADIGA


11 JORDENSEN DRIVE


PART OF LOT 83, PLAN 43M-1751, PART 5, PLAN 43R-32069, WARD 5


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 0.05m (0.16 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

PUNEET THAKRAL AND GANGA BISHT


150 VANHORNE CLOSE


LOT 165, PLAN 43M-1922, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 0.07m (0.23 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

ROBERT BOURNE AND GAZINA BOURNE


61 ISABELLA STREET


PART OF LOT 2, PLAN BR-5, PART 3, PLAN 43R-24563, WARD 1


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) having a gross floor area of 31.21 sq. m (335.94 sq. ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 sq. m (161.46 sq. ft.) for an individual accessory structure;
  2. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) having a height of 3.96m (13 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum height of 3.0m (9.84) for an accessory structure.

UPASANA AHLUWALIA, AJIT MOHAN AHLUWALIA, SIDDARTH AHLUWALIA AND SAKSHAM AHLUWALIA


233 MOUNTAINBERRY ROAD


LOT 28, PLAN M-1132, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an as-built above grade side entrance with a side yard setback of 1.05m (3.44 ft) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door whereas the by-law only permits an above grade side entrance where the side yard within which the door is located has a minimum width of 1.2m (3.94 ft) up to and including the door;
  2. To permit a 1.05m (3.44 ft) path of travel leading to the principal entrance to a second unit whereas the by-law requires an unencumbered side yard width of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance to the second unit;
  3. To permit a landing 0.69m (2.27 ft) above grade accessing a principal entrance to a second unit whereas the by-law requires the principal entrance to a second unit be accesses by a landing less than 0.6m (1.97 ft) above ground level;
  4. To permit an existing driveway width of 7.85m (25.75 ft) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.);
  5. To permit 0m of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping adjacent to the side lot line.

ANTHONY MAXIN AND TERESA FRANCIS


38 TIANALEE CRESCENT


PART OF BLOCK 127, PLAN 43M-1560, PART 1, PLAN 43R-29677, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade stairs to be located 7.45m (24.44 ft.) from the Trans Canada Pipeline right-of-way whereas the by-law requires that no permanent structures shall be located within 10.0m (32.80 ft.) of the limit of the Trans Canada Pipeline right-of-way;
  2. To permit an existing deck to be located 6.66m (21.85 ft.) from the Trans Canada Pipeline right-of-way whereas the by-law requires that no permanent structures shall be located within 10.0m (32.80 ft) of the limit of the Trans Canada Pipeline right-of-way.

RAMINDER PAL SINGH SAINI AND BALJEET SAINI


84 BLUE BONNETT DRIVE


LOT 31, PLAN M-0117, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing building addition having a rear yard setback of 5.34m (17.52 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.).

 

ICYLIN BROWN AND ANGEL BROWN


1 STILLMAN DRIVE


PART OF LOT 84, PLAN 43M-1751, PART 8, PLAN 43R-32069, WARD 5


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit below grade entrances between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) in the exterior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit accessory structures to be located within the exterior side yard;
  3. To permit a fence in the exterior side yard having a height of 2.4m (7.87 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum fence height of 2.0m (6.56 ft.). 

RAKSHANDA SHAHID


36 BONNIE BRAES DRIVE


PART OF LOT 296, PLAN 43M-1883, PARTS 1 AND 2, PLAN 43R-35054, WARD 4


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing open-roofed porch to encroach 7.0m (22.97 ft.) into the required rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 0.5m (1.64 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum encroachment of 2.0m fOR an open-roofed porch, resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.5m (18.04 ft.);
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.5m to an existing open-roofed porch (1.64 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.);
  3. To permit a rear yard encroachment of 6.89m (22.60 ft.) resulting in a rear yard setback of 0.61m (2 ft.) to an existing deck whereas the by-law permits a maximum rear yard encroachment of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) resulting in a rear yard setback of 5.7m to the existing deck;
  4. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.33m (1.08 ft.) to an existing deck whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

KIRANKUMAR PATEL AND PURVI PATEL


10 DALKEITH COURT


LOT 116, PLAN 43M-1931, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a commercial school (tutoring classes for a maximum of seven students) as a home occupation whereas the by-law does not permit a home occupation where the occupation creates a nuisance.

SATINDER SINGH CHATHA, SATWINDER KAUR CHATHA, AVTAR CHATHA AND DALJIT CHATHA


1 ANTLER DRIVE


LOT 129, PLAN 43M-1613, WARD 1


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing driveway width of 9.91m (32.51 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32m (24 ft.);
  2. To permit 0.0m of permeable landscaping abutting the property line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping abutting the property line.

RAVINDER SINGH


86 CLEARFIELD DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK 110, PLAN 43M-1810, PARTS 9 AND 10, PLAN 43R-34577, WARD 10


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.97m (3.18 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

PARAMPAL SINGH JANDU AND AMANDEEP KAUR SANDHU


48 EMERALD COAST TRAIL


LOT 2, PLAN 43M-2045, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.01m (0.03 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

RANJEET KAUR AND GURPREET SINGH


50 GREAT PLAINS STREET


LOT 103, PLAN M-1232, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.02m (0.07 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

PARMINDER DHALIWAL


47 KOOTENAY PLACE


LOT 290, PLAN M-1505, WARD 10


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 5.15m (16.90 ft.) to an attached garage whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 6.0m (19.68 ft.);
  2. To permit a building to be located 8.87m (29.10 ft.) from a Floodplain Zone whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 10m (32.80 ft.) to a Floodplain Zone;
  3. To permit a cumulative garage door width of 9.75m (32 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum garage door width of 5.5m (18 ft.);
  4. To permit a cumulative interior garage width of 11.69m (38.35 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum interior garage width of 6.4m (21 ft.);
  5. To permit a driveway width of 19.06m (62.53 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 9.14m (30 ft.).

AIRPORT 407 BUSINESS CAMPUS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AIRPORT 407 BUSINESS CAMPUS G.P INC. AND AIRPORT 407 BUSINESS CAMPUS INC.


40 DRIVER ROAD


PART OF LOT 15, CONCESSION 7 SOUTHERN DIVISION, WARD 8


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a maximum building height of 18.2m (59.8 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 17.5m (57.4 ft.).

NAGHMANA ARSHAD AND SHAKEEL AHMED


1 BROWNBUSH WAY


LOT 56, PLAN 43M-1934, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a parking space depth of 3.69m (12.11 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4m (17.72 ft.).

THE SACCO GROUP LTD. 


3 CHAPEL STREET


LOT 1, PLAN BR-2, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a place of amusement (commercial golf simulator) whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use.

BRANTHAVEN CREDITVIEW INC.


8940 CREDITVIEW ROAD


PART OF LOT 5, CONCESSION 4 W.H.S., PART 1, PLAN 43R-14727, WARD 4


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a temporary sales office for a period of three (3) years whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use in an Agricultural Zone.

PARTH SHAH AND HINAL PARTH SHAH


4 RAIN LILY LANE


PART OF LOT 65, PLAN M-1114, PART 16, PLAN 43R-20429, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance on a lot containing a quattroplex whereas the by-law only permits a below grade entrance in a single detached, semi detached or townhouse dwelling;
  2. To permit a side yard setback of 1.29m (4.23 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.);
  3. To permit a second dwelling unit (basement apartment) on a lot containing a quattroplex whereas the by-law only permits a second dwelling unit in a single detached, semi detached or townhouse dwelling.

ABHISHEK SINGH TANWAR AND MANISHA TANWAR


24 GRAND RIVER COURT


PART OF BLOCK G, PLAN M-95, PARTS 53, 53A AND 53B, PLAN 43R-3631, WARD 8


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 128 of the by-law to permit a carport located outside the approved building envelope whereas the by-law requires that all buildings be constructed in accordance with Schedule ‘C’, Section 128 to the by-law;
  2. To permit an existing accessory structure (shed) having a setback of 0.54m (1.78 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to the nearest lot lines for an accessory structure.

WAHEGURU EMPIRE INC.


2 LOWRY DRIVE


PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-286, PARTS 1, 2, PLAN 43R-22070, WARD 2


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a place of commercial recreation (basketball/badminton courts) as a permitted use whereas the by-law does not permit a place of commercial recreation.

OM JAKHU AND CHANDER KANTA JAKHU


18 SCARLETT DRIVE


LOT 156, PLAN M-740, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variances(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 9.18m (30 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32m (24ft.).
No Item Selected