Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Ron Chatha (Chair)
  • Desiree Doerfler (Vice-Chair)
  • Ana Cristina Marques
  • David Colp

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.


NOTICE: In-person public attendance at the meeting may be limited due to prevailing public health gathering requirements. Public and other meeting participants are encouraged to observe meetings online or participate remotely by contacting the City Clerk’s Office through the contact details below.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:
Jeanie Myers, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, [email protected]


Letter dated February 01, 2023 from Colin Chung, Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc., requesting a deferral for application A-2022-0022 (Agenda Item 9.1).


Letter dated February 13, 2023 from Tanvir Rai, Noble Prime Solutions Ltd, requesting that application A-2023-0007 (Agenda Item 8.9) be withdrawn.

NABILA ASLAM


16 NUTWOOD WAY


PART OF BLOCK 148, PLAN 43M-1785, PARTS 12 AND 13, PLAN 43R-2967, WARD 9


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard; 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.41m (1.35 ft.) to a below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.).

PARDEEP NIJJAR AND PARAMJIT NIJJAR


8613 CREDITVIEW ROAD


LOT 3, PLAN 43M-1885, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 2.93m (9.61 ft.) to a proposed sunroom addition whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.0m (22.97 ft.).

8550 GOREWAY PORTFOLIO INC.


8550 GOREWAY DRIVE


PART OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 4,CONCESSION 7 ND, WARD 8


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a motor vehicle repair shop in conjunction with the permitted warehouse use whereas the by-law does not permit a motor vehicle repair shop as a principal or accessory use;
  2. To permit the outside storage of oversized motor vehicles and truck trailer whereas the by-law does not permit outside storage;
  3. To permit a fence in the front yard having a height of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) whereas the by-law does not permit a fence in the front yard.

SEVERINO CAPUTO-NEVETS AIRPORT HOLDING INC.


81 DELTA PARK BOULEVARD


LOT 6, PLAN 43M-773, WARD 8


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 50 parking spaces whereas the by-law requires at least one parking space for each 55 sq. m of gross floor area, resulting in a minimum of 75 parking spaces.

MICHAEL PINHEIRO AND MARIA PINHEIRO


2207 EMBLETON ROAD


PART OF LOT 5, CONCESSION 5 WHS, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 3.53m (11.58 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 12.0m (40 ft.);
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.85m (6.07 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.);
  3. To permit a garage door opening to be 4.86m (15.94 ft.) from the front lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 6.0m (19.68 ft.) from the front lot line.

DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND AXHANA SINGH CHHETRI


38 NEWBRIDGE CRESCENT


PART OF LOT 65, PLAN M-338, PART 1, PLAN 43R-10480, WARD 7


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an above grade side door having an interior side yard setback of 0.83m (2.72 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) from an interior side yard to an above grade door;
  2. To permit a 0.83m (2.72 ft.) path of travel leading to the primary entrance to a second unit whereas the by-law requires an unencumbered side yard with of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to be provided as a path of travel from the front yard to the entrance to the second unit.

DALJIT KAUR BAL, HARJINDER SINGH BAL AND HARLEEN KAUR BAL


30 MARINE DRIVE


LOT 15, PLAN 43M-1298, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit a below grade entrance in the interior side yard having a setback of 0.06m (0.20 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.);
  3. To permit an accessory structure (shed) having a side and rear yard setback of 0.15m (0.50 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m (1.97 ft.) to the nearest lot lines for an accessory structure;
  4. To permit 0.0m permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line.

VIKRAMJIT SINGH


23 PENBRIDGE CIRCLE


LOT 89, PLAN M-1496, WARD 6


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit 0.0m permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line;
  3. To permit an existing driveway width of 6.96m (22.83 ft.) whereas the by-law permit a maximum driveway width of 6.71m (22 ft.).

MANJOT GILL AND AMITOJ GILL


1 WHEATBERRY CRESCENT


LOT 255, PLAN M-2060, WARD 9


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a below grade entrance between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line whereas the by-law does not permit below grade entrances between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 3.38m (11.09 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5m (14.76 ft.);
  3. To permit 0.3m (0.98 ft.) permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) of permeable landscaping between the driveway and the side lot line.

UMAIR ZAHID


50 CALEDON CRECENT


LOT 217, PLAN 695, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a side yard setback of 1.3m (4.27 ft.) to the second storey whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.);
  2. To permit a balcony encroachment in the side yard having a setback of 1.52m (5.0 ft.) whereas the by-law does not permit a balcony in the side yard;
  3. To permit a driveway width of 7.37m (24.18 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32m (24 ft.);
  4. To permit 0.3m (0.98 ft.) permeable landscape strip whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m (1.97 ft.) permeable landscape strip.

Note: A supplementary report was received and published on February 10, 2023.

LESZEK WOJCICKI


45 JUNIPER CRESCENT


LOT 12, PLAN 862, WARD 8


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.76m (2.50 ft.) to an as-built attached carport whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to an attached carport.

JAYANT PATEL AND HIRAL PATEL


8414 CREDITVIEW ROAD


PART OF LOT 3, CONCESSION 3 WHS, WARD 4


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing lot area of 0.1621 hectares for non-agricultural purposes whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.4 hectares for non-agricultural purposes;
  2. To permit an existing lot width of 30.5 metres whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 45 metres;
  3. To permit an easterly interior side yard setback of 4.51m (14.80 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.);
  4. To permit a westerly interior side yard setback of 4.05m (13.25 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5m (24.60 ft.);
  5. To permit a rear yard setback of 1.28m to a Floodplain Zone whereas the by-law requires a rear yard setback of 15m;
  6. To permit a balcony and deck encroachment of 15m into the required rear yard setback, resulting in a rear yard setback of 0.0m to the Floodplain Zone whereas the by-law permits a maximum balcony and deck encroachment of 3m into the required rear yard, resulting in a rear yard setback of 12m;
  7. To permit a portion of the balcony (cantilevered) to be located within a Floodplain Zone whereas the by-law does not permit the balcony to be located within the Floodplain Zone;
  8. To permit two existing accessory structures (sheds) to be located within a Floodplain Zone whereas the by-law does not permit accessory structures within a Floodplain;
  9. To permit 62% of the required front yard to be landscaped whereas the by-law requires a minimum required front yard landscaping of 70%.

CATHERINE MCCALLUM


132 ELIZABETH STREET SOUTH


PART OF LOTS 7 AND 8, PLAN BR-27, WARD 3


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (proposed shed) having a gross floor area of 23.8 sq. m (256.20 sq. ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 sq. m (161.46 sq. ft.) for an accessory structure;
  2. To permit an accessory structure (proposed shed) having a maximum height of 3.2m (10.50 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum height of 3.0m (9.84 ft.).

VIVEK KUMAR KHANNA AND BASUDHA KHANNA


198 EARNSCLIFF CIRCLE


LOT 248, PLAN 765, WARD 7


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an as-built below grade entrance in the required interior side yard whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in the required interior side yard;
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.96m (6.43 ft.) to an as-built below grade entrance whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 3.0m (9.84 ft.).

JOHN CURIC AND MARIA ELIZABETH ROCHA


22 FERNDALE CRESCENT


LOT 311, PLAN 679, WARD 3


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 5.07m (16.63 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 6.0m (19.68 ft.);
  2. To permit a lot coverage of 33.47% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

SURJIT KAUR MALHI


47 FERNDALE CRESCENT


LOT 410, PLAN 679, WARD 3


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a side yard setback of 1.42m (4.66 ft.) to the second storey whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.8m (5.91 ft.) to the second storey;
  2. To permit a lot coverage of 36.5% whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

BRANTHAVEN CREDITVIEW INC.


8940 CREDITVIEW ROAD


PART OF LOT 5, CONCESSION 4 W.H.S., PART 1, PLAN 43R-14727, WARD 4


The applicant is requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a temporary sales office for a period of three (3) years whereas the by-law does not permit the proposed use in an Agricultural Zone.

NILAM SHAH AND BHAVIN SHAH


42 LYLE WAY


LOT 60, PLAN 43M-3030, WARD 8


The applicants are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (gazebo) having a building height of 3.327m (10.92 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum building height of 3.0m (9.84 ft.) for an accessory structure;
  2. To permit an accessory structure (gazebo) having a gross floor area of 23.78 sq. m (256 sq. ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 sq. m (161.46 sq. ft.) for an individual accessory structure;
  3. To permit an uncovered pool (hot tub) with an rear yard setback of 0.78m (2.56 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to the nearest lot lines;
  4. To permit a driveway width of 15.72m (51.57 ft.) whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 9.14m (30 ft.);
  5. To permit a recreational facility (sports court) with an interior side yard setback of 0.762m (2.50 ft.) whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 1.2m (3.94 ft.) to the nearest lot lines.
No Item Selected