Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Jarmanjit Singh Dehriwal (Chair)
  • Baljit Mand (Vice-Chair)
  • Jotvinder Sodhi (Vice-Chair)
  • Ron Chatha
  • Paul Khaira
  • James Reed
  • Sarbjeet Saini
  • Thisaliny Thirunavukkarasu
  • Manoharan Vaithianathan

 

 

 

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:


Clara Vani, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, [email protected]


Quarre (Two) Inc. 


10750 Highway 50


Toronto Gore Con 12 ND Part Lot 14 RP 43R36390 Part 2, Ward 10


The purpose of the application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to the grant of an easement for Parts 2 and 3 on Plan 43R-40926. The proposed easement has a width of approximately 32.09 metres and an area of approximately 1825 square metres. It is proposed that a shared access easement be established over the lands known as 10750 Highway 50 in favour of the abutting property municipally known as 10815 Coleraine Drive.

Harmandeep Gill, Kulbir Gill, Iqbal Dhindsa, Harpreet Dhindsa


0 Creditview Road


Con 3, WHS Part Lot 2, RP 43R18425 Parts 2, 3, 4, Ward 4


Associated Files A-2023-0395 and A-2023-0396


The purpose of the application is to request a consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 0.36 hectares (0.88 acres); together with a shared access easement in favour of the retained and the severed lands. The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 20.79 metres, a depth of approximately 88.50 metres, and an area of approximately 1851 square metres.  It is proposed that 2 lots be established from the existing lot for future residential development of a two storey dwelling on each lot together with a shared access easement.

Juellcom19DeltaParkInc


19 Delta Park Blvd


Con 7 ND Part Lot 4, RP 43R15307 Parts 1,2, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure having a gross floor area of 1532.13 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a gross floor area of 100 square metres;
  2. To permit an accessory structure having a height of 13.18 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 4.5 metres;
  3. To permit an accessory structure having a setback of 2 metres to the side property line, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure in the interior side yard having a setback of 3 metres;
  4. To permit a reduced sideyard setback of 0.0 metres to the proposed outside storage, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 8.0 to outside storage within an interior side yard;
  5. To permit a 2.0 metre fence located in a front yard, whereas the by-law does not permit a fence located in the front yard; and
  6. To permit 0% landscaped open space within the interior side yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 50% of the required side yard to be landscaped open space free of parking, driveway and pavement.

Mohinder Singh, Parmjit Kandola


188 Willow Park Drive


Plan M1340, Lot 13, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres. 

Ahmed Meghani


10 Newport Street


Plan M441, Lot 73, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres. 

Ahmed Meghani


51 Nasmith Street 


Plan M641, Lot 12, Plan M867 Block 86, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71 metres. 

Suncor Energy Inc.


354 Queen Street East


Con 2 EHS, Part Lot 6, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an associated drive through facility, whereas the by-law prohibits a drive through facility associated with any use. 

Gaurav Gupta


12 Navy Crescent


Plan M1386, Lot 207, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line, whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line. 

Suthakaran Makendran


9 Delphinium Way


Plan 43M1748, Lot 254, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways  constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard  setback of 0.11 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 0.3 metres. 

Olanrewaju Duyile, Mojisola Duyile


95 Starhill Crescent


Plan M1403 Part Lot 173, RP 43R25669 Part 11, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.93 metres to a existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres. 

ADA Pet Holdings Ltd. 


2450 Queen Street East 


Con 6 EHS, Part Lot 6, RP43R10152 Parts 1 to 3, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule 'C' Section 336 of the by-law to permit a proposed 10.4 square meter building addition located outside the approved building envelope, whereas the by-law requires that all buildings be constructed in accordance with Schedule 'C' Section 336 of the by-law. 

Bidisha Sengupta


51 Sutter Avenue


Plan M108, Lot 83, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.77 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71 metres; and
  2. To permit a 0.24 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line. 

Avinder Pal Singh, Ravneet Kaur Pannu


56 Willowcrest Court


Plan M416 Lot 50, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line, whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 2.95 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3 metres. 

Sharon Mayne Devine


60 West Drive


Plan 895 Part Block C, RP 43R21069 Parts 1 and 3, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 4 additional short term crisis units for a total of 12 units for the Short Stay program, whereas the by-law does not permit a short term crisis unit. 

1335338 Ontario Limited, William Robert Hewson, 6602142 Canada Inc. 


174, 178 and 180 Queen Street East


Plan BR13, Part Lots 23 and 24, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a gross floor area of 1900 square metres for each storey greater than 12 metres above grade containing residential dwelling units, whereas the by-law permits a  maximum gross floor area of 800 metres for each storey greater than 12 metres above grade containing residential dwelling units;
  2. To permit a maximum tower width of 66 metres (87.2% of the width of the building at grade) for the portion of the building greater than 12 metres above grade, whereas the by-law requires that the maximum tower width for any portion of the building greater than 12 metres above grade shall not exceed 50% of the width of the building at grade; and
  3. To permit 0% of the gross area of the side walls within 6 metres of the front lot line and less than 4 metres above grade will have windows and/or doors, whereas the by-law requires that a minimum 70% of the gross area of the side walls within 6 metres of the front lot line and less than 4 metres above grade shall have windows and/or doors.

Gaurav Garg, Shilpy Singla


10 Lilestone Drive


Plan 43M1962, Lot 54, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.02 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres provided the combined total of the interior side yards on an interior lot is not less than 1.8 metres.

Gagandeep Singh Dhaliwal, Hareen Kaur 


13 Vivians Crescent


Plan M983, Lot 7, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing rear yard setback of 6.33 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires no building or structures, including swimming pools, shall be located closer than 7.6 metres to any lands zoned OS; and
  2. To permit an existing deck to encroach 2.66 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 4.94 metres from the deck to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires no building or structures, including swimming pools, shall be located closer than 7.6 metres to any lands zoned OS.

Muhammad Saqib, Fatima Noori


14 Portrush Trail 


Plan 43M1720 Part Lot 301, RP 43R31812 Part 5, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing open roof porch to encroach 3.68 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 3.31 metres from the open roof porch to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits an open roof porch to encroach a maximum of 2 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a required setback of 5 metres.

Prameeth Babu Bhupathi


15 Simmons Blvd.


Plan M303 Part Lot 27, RP 43R7530 Parts 18 and 38, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a existing exterior stairway leading to an existing below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard;  and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.65 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Shreekumar Swamidas Nair


16 Woodhaven Drive


Plan 43M1436 Part Lot 181, RP 43R25559 Parts 2 and 3, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line,  whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.09 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres. 

Rajwinder Kaur Rasoda, Narinder Singh Rasoda


11 Tiger Crescent


Plan 43M2104, Lot 39. Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard,  whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.11 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Pardeep Grewal


9 Desertrose Way


Plan 43M1714, Lot 17, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard,  whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.11 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Sampuran Khehra, Davinder Khehra


52 Kingknoll Drive


Plan M652, Lot 243, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.48 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Harmandeep Gill, Kulbir Gill, Iqbal Dhindsa, Harpreet Dhindsa


0 Creditview Road


Con 3, WHS Part Lot 2, RP 43R18425 Parts 2, 3, 4, Ward 4


Associated Files B-2023-0031 and A-2023-0396


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a lot area of 0.18 hectares, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot area of 0.2 hectares;
  2. To permit a lot width of 20.62 metres, whereas the by-law permits a lot width of 45 metres;
  3. To permit an interior side yard (west side) setback of 2 metres, whereas the by-law permits an interior side yard setback of 7.5 metres;  and
  4. To permit an interior side yard (east side) setback of 3.76 metres, whereas the by-law permits an interior side yard setback of 7.5 metres.

Harmandeep Gill, Kulbir Gill, Iqbal Dhindsa, Harpreet Dhindsa


0 Creditview Road


Con 3, WHS Part Lot 2, RP 43R18425 Parts 2, 3, 4, Ward 4


Associated Files B-2023-0031 and A-2023-0395


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a lot area of 0.18 hectares, whereas the by-law permits a minimum lot area of 0.2 hectares;
  2. To permit a lot width of 20.79 metres, whereas the by-law permits a lot width of 45 metres;
  3. To permit an interior side yard (west side) setback of 3.72 metres, whereas the by-law permits an interior side yard setback of 7.5 metres; and
  4. To permit an interior side yard (east side) setback of 2 metres, whereas the by-law permits an interior side yard setback of 7.6 metres.

Virjanand Singh, Amrita Lall


23 Permafrost Drive


Plan 43M1666, Lot 117, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.00 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Paramjot Singh, Arshjot Singh, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, Pawandeep Kaur Sidhu


117 Tysonville Circle


Plan 43M1942. Lot 48, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.12 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.20 metres.  

Gurunoor Kaleka, Harpreet Kaleka


42 Donald Stewart Road


Con 3, WHS, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line, whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line;
  2. To permit a proposed  exterior side yard setback of 1.36 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres; and
  3. To permit a 1.02 metre pedestrian path of travel to the entrance of the second unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres to the entrance of the second unit.

Prashant Chandna


71 Robert Parkinson Drive


Plan 43M1922, Lot 306, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.26 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side provided that the combined total for interior each lot is 1.8 metres.  

Mahabubul Hasan Choudhury


45 Frontenac Crescent


Plan 43M1600, Part Lot 78, RP 43R29049 Part 23, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.1 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres. 

Richard Rattansingh, Rajdai Rattansingh


25 Markham Street 


Plan M271, Lot 27, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.0 metres to an existing sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres; and
  2. To permit a lot coverage of 42%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

Kaneff Properties Limited


7500 and 7510 Financial Drive


Toronto Con 4 WHS Part Lot 13, RP 43R40143 Part 2, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit the outside storage of a nitrogen tank in the interior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit outside storage.

Kamaljeet Kaur


53 Velvet Grass Lane


Plan M1222, Part Lot 110, RP 43R22487 Parts 64 and 65, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an additional residential unit in a Quatro plex, whereas the by-law only permit an additional residential unit in a single detached, semi-detached or townhouse dwelling.

Piyaseeli Perera


20 Butlermere Drive


Plan M960, Lot 95, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 0.24 metres setback to the steps and landing for an above grade side entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9 metres (2.95 feet) to any steps (or landing) in the interior side yard;
  2. To permit an Additional Residential Unit (ARU) entrance along a 1.2 metre side-yard with a landing 0.89 metres above grade, whereas the by-law requires an above grade landing within a 1.2 metre side-yard be a maximum of 0.6 metres above grade;
  3. To permit an above grade landing in a 1.2 metre side-yard that does not provide stairs to the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires that a landing used to access an ARU within a 1.2 metre side-yard provides steps to the rear yard; and
  4. To permit a maximum landing and step width of 1.27 metres, whereas the by-law requires a maximum landing and step width of 0.9 metres. 

Larry Castro, Marilyn DeGuzman-Castro


224 Sussexvale Drive


Plan 43M1891, Lot 23, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 3.48 metres to a proposed single storey addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.02 metres to a proposed deck, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Haider Sahi


8201 Churchville Road


Con 3, WHS Part Lot 2, RP 43R3899 Part 1, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed 2-storey building addition with an interior side yard setback of 2.79 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 7.5 metres. 

Gayatri Anad


3 Haggert Avenue South


Plan 429, Part Lot 10, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 3.08 metres to a proposed sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 5.47 metres.

Kathik Vankata Chalam, Archana Thiruvasainallur Swaminathan


19 Manzanita Crescent


Plan 43M1947, Lot 133, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit a 0.02 metres side yard setback to a proposed exterior stairway leading to below grade entrance in the required interior side yard, resulting in a combined side yard width of 0.64 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 0.6 metres provided that the combined total for both side yards on an interior lot is 1.8 metres.

Sagar Saini


29 Carmel Crescent


Plan 43M1616, Lot 93, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line, whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and the flankage lot line. 

Nishan Cheema, Baljinder Kaur, Mandeep Cheema, Dalwinder Cheema


25 Goodview Drive


Plan 43M2102, Lot 49, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance located between the main wall of the dwelling and the flankage lot line, whereas the by-law does not permit a stairway constructed below established grade to be located between the main wall of a dwelling and a flankage lot line. 

The Gore Plaza Inc.


0 Nexus Avenue


Toronto Gore Con 10 ND Part Lot 5, RP 43R30640 Parts 3 and 5, RP 43R30690 Parts 1 to 4, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a building setback of 3.0 metres to Nexus Avenue, whereas the By-Law requires a minimum building setback of 6.0 metres from Nexus Avenue;
  2. To permit a landscape open space of 3.0 metres abutting Nexus Avenue, whereas the By-Law requires a minimum landscape open space of 6.0 metres abutting Nexus Avenue; and
  3. To permit residential uses in conjunction with permitted non-residential uses, whereas the By-law does not permit the use.

1000004087 Ontario Inc. 


15 Hale Road


Con 2 EHS Part Lot 1, RP 43R1794 Part1, Ward 3


Deferred from October 3, 2023


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow for motor vehicle sales as a permitted use, whereas motor vehicle sales is not permitted;
  2. To allow for 17 parking spaces, whereas a minimum of 23 parking spaces is required;
  3. To allow for the outside storage and display of motor vehicles for sale to be located in the front yard, whereas no outside storage is permitted unless in a rear or interior side yard and such storage shall be screened from view by a solid fence; and
  4. To permit a lot area of 1550 square meters, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot area of 1800 square metres for a vehicle impound use.  

Ten Lightbeam Property Inc.


16-10 Lightbeam Terrace


PSCP 1073, LVL 1, Unit 16, Ward 6


Deferred from October 24, 2023


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a retail area of 30.11% of the total gross floor areas of the associated use, whereas the by-law permits a maximum retail area of 15% of the total gross floor area of the associated use. 

Sewa Singh Bhella, Parkash Kaur Bhella, Balwinder Kaur Bhella


89 Olde Town Road


Plan M1384, Lot 5, Ward 5


Deferred from October 24, 2023


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.54 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71 metres.

Surila Talwar Bennett


46 Elgin Drive


Plan 872, Lot 94, Ward 3


Deferred from December 19, 2023


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.8 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres. 

Next Scheduled Meeting:   February 20, 2024 at 9:30 a.m.

No Item Selected