Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Jarmanjit Singh Dehriwal (Chair)
  • Baljit Mand (Vice-Chair)
  • Jotvinder Sodhi (Vice-Chair)
  • Ron Chatha
  • Paul Khaira
  • James Reed
  • Sarbjeet Saini
  • Thisaliny Thirunavukkarasu
  • Manoharan Vaithianathan

 

 

 

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations (some advance notice may be required), please contact:


Clara Vani, Secretary-Treasurer, Telephone 905.874.2117, [email protected]


Pragnesh Vyas, Falguni Vyas


37 Riverstone Drive


Plan 43M1714, Lot 73, Part Block 390 and RP 43R33348, Part 1, Ward 8


Ravinder Singh, authorized agent, withdrawal letter dated July 2, 2024 

1000683094 Ontario Inc. 


42 Regan Road, Unit 11-14


Peel Condo Plan 330 Level 1, Unit 12, Ward 2


Tanvir Rai, Authorized agent withdrawal letter, dated June 25, 2024

Jaydeep Banerjee, Nandini Chatterjee


56 Mirabell Court


Plan M776, Lot 30


Jaydeep Banerjee, applicant withdrawal letter, dated June 20, 2024

2514682 Ontario Inc., c/o Surinder Sharma


3455 Queen Street East


Brampton Con 7 ND, Part Lots 5, RP 43R34613, Parts 7, 11 to 16, 18, 24 to 26, 33, 34 and 36, Ward 8


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 1.413 hectares (3.49 acres), together with reciprocal easements for access, parking, and servicing. The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 9.08m (29.79 ft.), a depth of approximately 60.72m (199.21 ft.), and an area of approximately 7,716 sq. m (1.91 acres). The retained lands will continued to be occupied by a 6 storey motel building and a 2 storey retail/office building. No development is currently proposed for the severed lands.


Associated Files A-2024-0233 (Item 9.42) and A-2024-0234 (Item 9.43)

Harvinder Kaur Singh


37 Cranberry Crescent


Plan M951, Lot 38, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.83 metres to a below grade window, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres to a below grade window.

Dalimchand Mangra, Roni Prabudial Mangra


7 Richgrove Drive 


Plan 43M1602, Lot 4, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 16.86 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 9.14 metres.

6380 Vipond Inc. 


255 Biscayne Crescent


Plan M947, Part Block 6, RP 43R23118, Part 1, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit motor vehicle sales (smart armored vehicles for commercial and government entities) only in conjunction with the existing manufacturing  use of smart armored vehicles for commercial and government entities, whereas the by-law does not permit motor vehicle sales.

Taranjit Singh Randhawa, Balwinder Randhawa


6 Egerton Street


Plan 43M1890, Lot 176, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 2.94 metres to a proposed sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.50 metres. 

Hartehal Singh Gill, Baljinder Kaur Gill


11 Redwillow Road


Plan 43M1633, Lot 270, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing roof structure to encroach 3.76 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 2.24 metres from the roof to the rear lot line,  whereas the by-law permits a roof structure, including eaves and cornices, to encroach a maximum 2.0 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a required setback of 4.0 metres from the deck to the rear lot line.

Anudeep Kambhampati, Praveena Kallem


3369 Mayfield Road 


Con 1, EHS Part Lot 17, RP 43R36273, Part 3, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit an existing driveway width of 14.51 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0.0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting both side lot lines, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Surjit Singh Boparai, Navneet Kaur, Naranjan Singh, Harminder Kaur Boparai


24 Preakness Court


Plan M829, Lot 82, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed garden suite with a gross floor area of 61.31 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a garden suite to have a maximum gross floor area of 35 square metres.

Radhika Sharma, Raj Kumar Ratti 


34 Olympia Crescent


Plan M1360, Lot 55, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing driveway width of 7.54 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres.

Smitha Kavungal Sudarshanan, Mahendra Ramachandran


529 Edenbrook Hill Drive


Plan 43M2022, Lot 181, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.04 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side provided that the combined total for both side yards on an interior lot is 1.8 metres.

Arvind Shankar Pandey, Bindeshwari Pandey


101 Clockwork Drive 


Plan 43M2099, Lot 158, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.03 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Harjinder Dhillon, Kuldip Dhillon


355 Sunny Meadow Blvd.


Plan 43M1691, Block 662, Plan 43M1731, Block 352, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.94 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres; and 
  2. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard.

Banarsi Arora, Sunil Arora


56 Balloon Crescent


Plan 43M1959, Lot 119, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed roof structure to encroach 3.66 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 3.84 metres from the roof structure to the rear lot line,  whereas the by-law permits a roof structure, including eaves and cornices, to encroach a maximum 2.0 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a required setback of 5.5 metres from the roof structure to the rear lot line.

Albana Limani, Vilaznim Limani


21 Hodgson Street


Plan M518, Lot 179


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 2.65 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3 metres.

Sivagamasundari Balenthiran


74 Southlake Blvd


Plan 43M1613, Lot 183, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed balcony to encroach 3.50 metres into an existing legal non-complying rear yard setback of 7.0 metres, resulting in a minimum setback of 3.5 metres from the balcony to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits a balcony to encroach a maximum of 1.8 metres into the rear yard. (Ref. SS 1160.2(13)).

Sudesh Kumar Sharma, Minakshi Sharma


2 Anatolia Street


Plan 43M2025, Lot 36, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.89 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum width of 7.0 metres. 

Gurbhej Singh Turna, Amandeep Kaur Turna


124 Botavia Downs Drive


Plan 43M1614 Part Lot 30, RP 43R29754, Part 13, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a personal service shop (salon) as a home occupation in a semi-detached dwelling, whereas the bylaw only permits an office as a home occupation in a semi-detached dwelling; and 
  2. To permit 2 parking spaces on the lot, whereas the bylaw requires a total of 3 parking spaces for the residential dwelling and proposed home occupation (salon).

Harpal Behan, Sukhwinder Behan


117 Kingknoll Drive 


Plan M779, Lot 21, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing above grade entrance in an interior side yard having a minimum width of 0.61 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door, whereas the by-law permits an above grade entrance when the interior side yard within which the door is located has a minimum width of 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door; and 
  2. To permit a 0.61 metre wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit; and
  3. To permit an existing driveway width of 7.67 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres.

Sandeep Nahal, Pargat Nahal


16 Lauraglen Crescent


Plan M1160, Lot 128, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing above grade entrance in a side yard having a minimum width of 0.90 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door,  whereas the by-law permits an above grade entrance when the side yard within which the door is located has a minimum width of 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door; 
  2. To permit a 0.90 metre wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit; 
  3. To permit a driveway width of 7.32 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 5.5 metres; and 
  4. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line. 

Baltej Gill, Kiranjit Gill


22 Vanwood Crescent


Plan 43M1918, Lot 57, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.00 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Paramjit Padda, Tajinder Singh Padda


63 Hanbury Crescent


Plan 43M2011, Lot 49, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing driveway width of 8.59 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0.40 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Pardeep Singh, Sandeep Singh


28 Dolly Varden Drive 


Plan 43M1667, Lot 216, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.04 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres; and 
  2. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard.

Sunil Kumar Bungay, Meenu Meenakshi Bungay


12 Bernard Avenue


Plan 43M1644, Part Block 25, RP 43R29768 Parts 361 and 362, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.42 metres to a proposed garden suite, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.8 metres to a garden suite; 
  2.  To permit a separation distance from the principal dwelling of 2.79 metres to a proposed garden suite, whereas the by-law requires a minimum separation distance of 3.0 metres from the principal dwelling to a garden suite; 
  3. To permit a driveway width of 5.63 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 5.5 metres; and 
  4. To permit a parking space depth of 4.9 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4 metres.

Soni Rose Mathew, Rony Kandathimakal Baby 


201 Bufford Drive 


Plan M688, Lot 12, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a existing above grade entrance in a side yard having a minimum width of 0.93 metres extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to the door, whereas the by-law permits an above grade entrance when the side yard within which the door is located has a minimum width of 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) extending from the front wall of the dwelling up to and including the door.

Gurpreet Chauhan, Beant Chauhan


12 Cottongrass Lane


Plan 43M1559, Lot 167, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a rear yard setback of 4.35 metres to a proposed sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres;
  2. To permit a driveway width of 8.34 metres (27.33 feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and 
  3. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Swaran Singh


4 Maple Avenue


Plan BR2, Part Lots 17, 18, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 1), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.56 metres to the side lot line, whereas, the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 2), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.31 metres to the side lot line, whereas, the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  3. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed 2), located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.32 metres to the rear lot line; whereas, the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.6m to the nearest lot line; 
  4. To permit a combined gross floor area of 20.44 square metres (220 square feet) for two (2) accessory structures (existing sheds), whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; 
  5. To permit a driveway width of 10.37 metres (34feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; 
  6. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting both side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot lines; and
  7. To permit the rear yard to be paved for the purpose of parking whereas the by-law does not permit the rear yard to be paved for the purpose of parking (except on a driveway that lead to a garage).

Amal Rajvanshi, Vanisree Rajvanshi


53 Harper Road


Plan 625, Lot 339, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a fence in the required front yard of 6.0 metres having a height of 1.6 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum fence height of 1 metre in the required front yard of 6.0 metres.

Gopalakrishnan Durairajan, Kavitha Manikumar


69 Truro Circle


Plan 43M1949, Lot 195, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 2.04 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

Varinder Rehal, Sukhvinder Kaur 


32 Turtlecreek Blvd


Plan M553, Lot 104, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.94 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0.3 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Raman Murugappan, Kannaathal Murugappan 


20 Epsom Downs Drive


Plan 765, Lot 302, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a lot coverage of 37.42%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%; and 
  2. To permit 2 parking spaces on a lot that contains two Additional Residential Units (a second unit and a garden suite), whereas the by-law requires 3 parking spaces when a residential lot contains two Additional Residential Units.

Pardeep Kang, Navtej Kang


24 Tortoise Court


Plan M90, Lot 3, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing accessory structure (gazebo) located on a landscape deck having a gross floor area of 48.40 square metres (521 sq feet), whereas the by-law permits a gazebo on a landscaped deck having a maximum gross floor area of 10 square metres; 
  2. To permit an existing accessory structure (Shade structure) having a gross floor area of 23.69 square metres (255 square feet), whereas, the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 23 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  3. To permit a combined gross floor area of 72.09 square metres for two (2) existing accessory structures (Gazebo & shade structure), whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 40 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; and
  4. To permit an existing accessory structure (gazebo) located on a landscape deck having height of 4.57 metres, whereas the by-law permits a gazebo on a landscaped deck having a maximum height of not more than 3 metres measured from the walking surface of the landscape deck.

10254 Hurontario Property Inc. 


10200 Hurontario Street


Chinguacousy Con 1 WHS Part Lot 12, RP 43R38924, Parts 13 to 24, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To provide 760 parking spaces, whereas the by-law required 766.

Virender Rathi, Deepshikha Rathi


49 Possession Crescent


Plan 43M2014, Lot 61, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a driveway width of 9.14 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres.

Aslim Hussain, Nabila Aslim


19 Mayfair Crescent


Plan M261, Lot 59, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.601 metres to a proposed addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres to a one storey addition; 
  2. To permit a rear yard setback of 2.714 metres to a proposed addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 6.3 metres; and
  3. To permit a lot coverage of 49.5%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 30%.

Trustees of the Canadian Reformed Church of Brampton


10301 Creditview Road 


Chinguacousy Con 4, WHS Part lot 12, Plan 43M1424, Part Blocks 249 and 251, Part Fairhill Avenue and Part road allow, Plan 43M1846, Block 26 and RP 43R34334 Part Parts


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a proposed private elementary  school, whereas the by-law does not permit the use.

VRAJ Canada Community Centre


8827 Mississauga Road


Con 4 WHS Part Lot 5 and RP 43R31828 Part 2 Unreg, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow 27.5 percent front yard landscaping, whereas 70 percent front yard landscaping is permitted.

Harmeet Singh, Tanveer Kaur


44 Gladstone Square


Plan 859, Part Block A, Plan M46, Part Block A RP 43R3115, Parts 68, 68A and 68B, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a 1.04 metre wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metres leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit.  

Shahid Iqbal


20 McCleave Crescent


Plan M1140, Part Block 238, RP 43R20888, Part 19, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required exterior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit an existing exterior side yard setback of 2.97 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

 

Kirandeep Kaur, Har Karanvir Singh


2 Trewartha Crescent


Plan M106, Part Lot 37, RP 43R8499, Parts 1, 11, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and 
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 2.68 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.00 metres. 

Amarjit Banipal, Dalbir Banipal, Manroop Banipal


174 Bufford Drive 


Plan 43M1627, Lot 23, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required exterior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 1.86 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3 metres.

Birender Marwah


28 New Pines Trail


Plan 43M1909, Part Block 1, RP 43R35763 Parts 20 and 73, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed deck to encroach 4.0 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a setback of 3.0 metres from the deck to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law permits a deck to encroach a maximum 3.0 metres into the rear yard setback, resulting in a required setback of 4.0 metres from the deck to the rear lot line.

Gagndeep Singh Batth, Gurveer Kaur Batth


11 Bookton Street


Plan 43M2092, Lot 29, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.84 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and
  2. To permit 0.3 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

2514682 Ontario Inc., c/o Surinder Sharma


3455 Queen Street East


Brampton Con 7 ND, Part Lots 5, RP 43R34613, Parts 7, 11 to 16, 18, 24 to 26, 33, 34 and 36, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 88 parking spaces, whereas the by-law requires 140 parking spaces;
  2. To permit 30 required parking spaces on the severed lands to be used in conjunction with the hotel/retail/office uses on the retained parcel, whereas the by-law requires that all parking be provided on the same lot as the building or use for which it is required; and   
  3. To permit a parking aisle width of 1.6 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width of 6.6 metres.

Associated Files B-2024-0012 (Item 8.1) and A-2024-0234 (Item 9.43)

2514682 Ontario Inc., c/o Surinder Sharma


3455 Queen Street East


Brampton Con 7 ND, Part Lots 5, RP 43R34613, Parts 7, 11 to 16, 18, 24 to 26, 33, 34 and 36, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a lot width of 9.08 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum lot width of 50 metres; 
  2. To permit a parking aisle width of 5.18 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width of 6.6 metres; and
  3. To permit a parking lot associated with the hotel/retail/office uses on the retained lands, whereas the by-law does not permit a parking lot for uses located on an adjacent lot.

Associated Files B-2024-0012 (Item 8.1) and A-2024-0233 (Item 9.42)

Sharanjeet Thind, Aman Deep Singh


13 Henna Street


Plan 43M1958, Lot 70, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.51 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) located in the rear yard having a setback of 0.3 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  3. To permit a driveway width of 10.36 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres;  and 
  4. To permit 0.28 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

I2 Developments (Brampton) Inc.


209 Steeles Avenue West 


Plan 43M1644, Part Block 35, Plan 43M2062, Block 3, Part Block 2, RP 43R2062, Block 3, Part Block 2, RP 43R40118, Parts 5 to 7, 11, 12, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 466 residential units, whereas the by-law permits a maximum number of 462 residential units; and
  2. To permit 51 visitor parking spaces, whereas the by-law requires 70 parking spaces.

55 Hereford Investments ULC


55 Hereford Street


Plan 43M1673, Part Block 6, RP 43R40901, Parts 12 to 15, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit the construction or a building addition in the rear yard having an existing non-conforming setback of 0.0 metres to the zone boundary between lands zoned OC-2801 and M4-2808, whereas the by-law requires that all lands zoned OC-2801 zone be treated as a single lot for Zoning purposes and requires a setback of 6 metres between a building and the zone boundary between lands zoned OC-2801 and M4-2808.  Note: A building setback of 6m will be provided between the building (which straddles the zone boundary) and the rear lot line of the subject property; and 
  2. To permit a fence in the front yard, whereas a fence is not permitted in the front yard of any lot in an industrial zone.

Bunu Mathew Abraham, Mercy Mathew


14 River Road


Con 5 WHS Part Lot 6, Plan 311, Part Lot 7, RP 43R18560, Part 1, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 2.6 metres to a proposed two-storey addition to an existing single detached dwelling, whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 12 metres;
  2. To permit an addition to an existing Legal Non-Conforming Garden Suite having a setback of 0.0 metres to the interior property line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard width of 1.2 metres;
  3. To permit an increase of GFA of 65.33 square metres to an existing legal non-conforming garden suite, with an existing gross floor area of 63.95 square metres resulting in a total GFA of 129.28 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum of Garden Suite Gross Floor Area of 80 square metres on a lot in a Residential Hamlet zone; and
  4. To permit a minimum landscaped open space of 68.71% of the front yard, whereas the by-law a minimum landscaped open space of 70% of the front yard.

Deferred from May 21, 2024

Baligh Graieb, Nora Graieb


10 Hazelwood Drive 


Plan 717, Lot 100, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (existing pergola) having a gross floor area of 37.53 square metres (404 sq ft), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  2. To permit a front yard setback of 0.855 metres to a proposed ground floor addition,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 9.0 metres; 
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.995 metres to a proposed second floor addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.8 metres; 
  4. To permit a lot coverage of 42%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25%; 
  5. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a setback of 0.49 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  6. To permit an accessory structure (existing pergola) having a gross floor area of 18.95 square metres (204 square feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  7. To permit an accessory structure (existing pergola) having a height of 3.1 metre, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; 
  8. To permit an accessory structure (existing pergola) having a height of 3.2 metres,  whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; and
  9. To permit a combined gross floor area of 71.34 square metres for three (3) accessory structures, whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures. 

Deferred from April 23, 2024 

Main Street Developments Inc. 


227 and 229 Main Street South


Con 1, Part Lot 2, Plan 43M518, Part Block 213, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a back-to-back townhouse dwelling, whereas the By-law does not permit the use; 
  2. To provide no commercial uses within the first storey of any building with a wall adjacent to Hurontario/Main Street and Charolais Blvd, whereas the By-law requires any portion of the floor area within the first storey of any building with a wall adjacent to Hurontario/Main Street and Charolais Blvd shall be used for commercial purposes. Notwithstanding the above, entrances, lobbies and uses accessory to the apartment dwelling are permitted provided that no more than 30% of the wall facing the street is occupied by entrances or lobbies; 
  3. To permit a rear yard depth of 6.0 metres to a proposed back-to-back townhouse dwelling, Whereas the By-law requires a minimum rear yard depth of 25 metres for any portion of the building less than or equal to a height of 7.5 metres, and 35 metres to any portion of the building taller than 7.5 metres; 
  4. To permit a front yard setback of 60 metres to a proposed back-to-back townhouse dwelling, Whereas the by-law does not permit a back-to-back townhouse dwelling; 
  5. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.8 metres to a proposed back-to-back townhouse dwelling, whereas the by-law does not permit a back-to-back townhouse dwelling; 
  6. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 1.8 metres to a proposed back-to-back townhouse dwelling, whereas the by-law does not permit a back-to-back townhouse dwelling;
  7. To permit a 0.0m tower stepback from the edge of the podium at front yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum tower stepback of 3.0 metres from the edge of podium at the front yard; 
  8. To permit a 0.0m tower stepback from the edge of the podium at side yard, whereas the by-law requires a minimum tower stepback of 2.5 metres from the edge of podium at the side yard; 
  9. To permit all portions of the building with the exception of the elevator shaft and mechanical rooftop equipment to be located within the height limits set by a line that extends upward at a 45-degree angle from the rear property line, to a maximum height of 80 metres, whereas the by-law requires all portions of a building must be located within the height limits set by a line that extends upwards at a 45 degree angle, or lower, from the rear property line to a maximum height of 76 metres;
  10. To permit a maximum height of 11.8 metres for the back-to-back townhouse dwelling, whereas the by-law does not permit a back-to-back townhouse dwelling; 
  11. To permit a maximum podium Height of 41.0 metres, whereas the by-law permit a maximum podium height of 27.0 metres; 
  12. To permit a maximum Gross Floor Area of 48,500 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 39,000 square metres; 
  13. To permit a tower separation of 20 metres, whereas the by-law requires a tower separation of 25 metres; 
  14. To permit a maximum FSI of 7.62, whereas the by-law permits a maximum FSI of 3.0; 
  15. To permit a minimum landscaped open space of 24.9% of the lot area, including landscaped hard surfaces, whereas the by-law requires a minimum landscaped open space of 35% of the lot area, including landscaped hard surfaces; 
  16. To permit parking to be calculated at a rate of 0.2 spaces per unit for residents and 0.15 spaces per unit for visitors, whereas the by-law requires that parking be calculated at a rate of 0.38 spaces per unit for residents and 0.20 spaces per unit for visitors; 
  17. To permit the first storey of any back-to-back townhouse wall adjacent to a street, to have a minimum 10% of the gross area of the portion of the wall above grade shall have windows and/or doors, whereas the by-law requires the first storey of any wall adjacent to a street, a minimum 70% of the gross area of the portion of the wall above grade shall have windows and/or doors; and
  18. To permit a continuous street wall at grade level must occupy at least 95% of the entire available frontage facing Main Street and 95% of the entire available frontage facing any other public street. For the purposes of this subsection, "available frontage" means the total frontage excluding any required side yard setbacks, approved pedestrian and vehicular access locations, privately-owned publicly accessible spaces, required rear yard setback to the back-to-back townhomes and the length of frontage occupied by the back to back townhomes along Charolais Blvd, whereas the by-law requires that a continuous street wall at grade level must occupy at least 95% of the entire available frontage facing Main Street and 95% of the entire available frontage facing any other public street. For the purposes of this subsection, "available frontage" means the total frontage excluding any required side yard setbacks, approved pedestrian and vehicular access locations, and privately-owned publicly accessible spaces.

Deferred from June 18, 2024

2121256 Ontario Inc. c/o Graham M. Tobe


210 Rutherford Road South


Con 2, EHS Pat Lot 3, RP RD80, Part 6, PCL A45, RP 43R1460, Parts 2, 3, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit motor vehicle sales, whereas the by-law does not permit the use; and
  2. To permit 15 parking spaces, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces.

Mann Singh Kaler, Dharmveer Kaler 


20 Bridgend Crescent


Plan M1467, Lot 35, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a parking space depth of 4.79 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4 metres. 

Next Scheduled Meeting:   August 20, 2024 at 9:30 a.m.

No Item Selected