Revised Agenda
Committee of Adjustment
The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Hybrid Meeting - Virtual Option & In-Person in Council Chambers – 4th Floor – City Hall
Members:
  • Paul Khaira
  • James Reed
  • Sarbjeet Saini
  • Thisaliny Thirunavukkarasu
  • Manoharan Vaithianathan
  • Jarmanjit Singh Dehriwal (Chair)
  • Baljit Mand (Vice-Chair)
  • Jotvinder Sodhi (Vice-Chair)
  • Ron Chatha

 

 

 

The CoA meeting agenda, including minor variance and consent applications only, is published two Fridays prior to the scheduled Hearing date and the revised agenda, including staff reports and additional correspondence, etc. related to each application, is published the Friday prior to the scheduled Tuesday Hearing date.

 

Accessibility of Documents: 

Documents are available in alternate formats upon request. If you require an accessible format or communication support contact the Secretary-Treasurer at [email protected] or 905-874-2100, TTY 905.874.2130 to discuss how we can meet your needs.


Note: This meeting will be live-streamed and archived on the City’s website for future public access.


Sukhpreet Singh Bedi, Jasmeet Kaur Bedi


4 Cynthia Crescent


Plan M350, Lot 38, Ward 10


Shane Edwards, authorized agent withdrawal letter, dated November 20, 2024

Sandeep Jindal, Simi Jindal


20 Stillman Drive


Plan 43M1751, Lot 116, Ward 5


Sandeep Jindal, applicant withdrawal letter, dated November 20, 2024

That the following agenda items and minor variance applications, before the Committee of Adjustment at its July 16, 2024, meeting, be approved subject to the conditions set out in the staff recommendation for each respective application:

Item #

Application #

Location

8.2

B-2024-0020

98-100 Rutherford Road South

8.3

B-2024-0021

7646 Kennedy Road South

9.5

A-2024-0402

27 Troyer Street

9.9

A-2024-0408

11 Fallen Oak Court

9.11

A-2024-0412

4 Golan Drive

9.12

A-2024-0414

12-2131 Williams Parkway

9.13

A-2024-0415

134 Larkspur Road

9.14

A-2024-0416

9995 McVean Drive

9.15

A-2024-0417

23 Oblate Crescent

9.16

A-2024-0418

17 Silktop Trail

9.19

A-2024-0422

42 Keith Monkman Way

9.20

A-2024-0423

9780 Bramalea Road

9.23

A-2024-0426

44 Willow Park Drive

9.24

A-2024-0427

2 Shaftsbury Lane

9.25

A-2024-0428

1 Copeland Road

9.27

A-2024-0430

2500 Williams Parkway Unit 6 and 7

9.28

A-2024-0431

46 Everingham Circle

9.29

A-2024-0432

15 Braddock Drive

9.30

A-2024-0433

10629 Mississauga Road

 This decision reflects that in the opinion of the Committee, for each application:

    1. The variance authorized is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building, or structure referred to in the application, and
    2. The general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law and the City of Brampton Official Plan is maintained, and the variance is minor.

Mantella Corporation


21 Van Kirk Drive


Plan M286, Part Blocks J&L, RP 43R8869, Parts 3 & 4, Ward 1


The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to the grant of a servicing easement over 21 Van Kirk Drive in favour of 25 and 35 Van Kirk Drive.


Joseph Plutino, authorized agent deferral letter, dated November 26, 2024

Susanne Rosyln George, Rudolph Elliot George


57 Creditstone Road


Plan M829, Lot 34, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 10.74 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side property line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from September 17, 2024


(See Item 11.5)

Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 1.94 hectares (19400 square metres); together with a mutual access easement for shared driveway access. The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 56.76 metres; a depth of approximately 124.73 metres and an area of approximately 1.01 hectares. The consent application seeks to enable the creation of one non-residential lot under separate ownership and to establish a mutual access easement between the retained and severed lots.  No new construction or site alteration is being contemplated.


(See Item 8.1)


A-2024-0405


Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow Lot A to have a lot width of 56.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires Lot A to have a minimum lot width of 100 metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256; 
  2. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building A to be located outside the area identified on the Schedule, whereas the by-law requires that Building A to be located in accordance with the building footprint outline on Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  3. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building A with a gross commercial floor area not exceeding 3,075 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a gross commercial floor area for Building A shall not exceed 1,900 square metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  4. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be maintained outside the approved location, whereas the by-law requires on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be developed and maintained in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256;
  5. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 2.6 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along the westerly side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a 3 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along side lot line in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  6. To allow angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 1.9 metres in width and 4.35 metres in length, whereas the by-law requires angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.7 metres in width and 5.4 metres in length; 
  7. To allow a minimum parking aisle width of 4.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width 6.6 metres; 
  8. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 4.4 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, excepted for the driveway access points, whereas the by-law requires that a 4.5 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, except for the driveway access points in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  9. To permit 1 loading space, whereas the by-law requires 2 loading spaces. 
    *parking breakdown not provided to confirm if there is sufficient parking on site. In addition, tandem parking is only permitted for 50% of the required parking for motor vehicle repair. 

(See Item 9.7)


A-2024-0406


Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building B and Building C to be located outside the area identified on the Schedule, whereas the by-law requires that Building B and Building C to be located in accordance with the building footprint outline on Schedule ‘C- Section 256;
  2. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building B with a gross commercial floor area not exceeding 2,840 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a gross commercial floor area for Building B shall not exceed 1,400 square metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256;
  3. To allow angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.6 metres in width and 3.4 metres in length; whereas the by-law requires angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.7 metres in width and 5.4 metres in length; 
  4. To allow 147 parking spaces to be provided on site, whereas the by-law requires a 158 parking spaces to be provided on site; 
  5. To allow a minimum parking aisle width of 2.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width 6.6 metres; 
  6. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 4.4 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, excepted for the driveway access points,  whereas the by-law requires that a 4.5 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, except for the driveway access points in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  7. To allow 1 loading space to be provided on site, whereas the by-law requires 2 loading spaces to be provided on site; 
  8. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 0m wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along the easterly side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a 3m wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along side lot line in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  9. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be maintained outside the approved location, whereas the by-law requires on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be developed and maintained in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256.
    *parking breakdown not provided to confirm if there is sufficient parking on site. Still require the distance from the loading space to the severance line.

(See item 9.8)

Christine Haye- Callaghan


70 Commodore Drive 


Plan M1751, Lot 229L, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.21 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

(See item 11.1)

Mohammed Ilyas 


2257 and 2267 Embleton Road 


Chinguacousy, CON 5, WHS, Part Lot 5, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a Day Nursey, whereas the by-law does not permit the use;
  2. To permit 40% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space, whereas the Zoning by-law requires a minimum 70% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space;
  3. To permit a front yard setback of 8 metres, whereas the by-law requires a front yard setback of 12 metres;
  4. To permit a side yard setback of 6 metres, whereas the by-law requires a side yard setback of 7.5 metres; and
  5. To permit a building height of 12 metres, whereas the by-law permit of a maximum building height of 10 metres.

(See item 11.2)


Additional correspondence was received and posted to the agenda on December 9, 2024.

Baligh Graieb, Nora Graieb


10 Hazelwood Drive


Plan 717, Lot 100, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 2.043 metres to a proposed ground floor addition (Attached Garage), whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 9.0 metres; 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 2.587 metres to a proposed ground floor addition (Attached Garage) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.8 metres; 
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.952 metres to a proposed Ground Floor & Second Floor Addition whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.8 metres; 
  4. To permit a lot coverage of 39.7%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25%; 
  5. To permit 2 accessory structures (Existing Pergola ‘C’ & Existing Shed ‘B’) to be constructed on an easement, whereas the by-law does not permit accessory structures to be constructed upon any easement; 
  6. To permit 3 accessory structures whereas the zoning by-law permits a maximum of not more than one swimming pool enclosure, and two accessory buildings, other than a swimming pool on a lot; 
  7. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘A’) having a gross floor area of 18.95 square metres (204 square feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  8. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘A’) having a height of 3.2 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; 
  9. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) to be used for human habitation, whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure to be used for human habitation; 
  10. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) having a gross floor area of 37.34 square metres (402 square feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  11. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) having a height of 3.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; 
  12. To permit a combined gross floor area of 71.34 square metres for three (3) accessory structures, whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; and
  13. To permit a semicircular Residential Driveway with a maximum surface area of 59.29% of the front yard area, whereas the by-law permits a maximum surface area of 50% of the front yard area for a Residential Driveway.

(See item 11.3)

Abhinav Sharma, Mridula Sharma


38 Eastman Drive 


Plan 43M2087, Lot 24, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 3.39 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5 metres.

(See item 11.8)

Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 1.94 hectares (19400 square metres); together with a mutual access easement for shared driveway access. The proposed severed lot has a frontage of approximately 56.76 metres; a depth of approximately 124.73 metres and an area of approximately 1.01 hectares. The consent application seeks to enable the creation of one non-residential lot under separate ownership and to establish a mutual access easement between the retained and severed lots.  No new construction or site alteration is being contemplated.


Associated applications A-2024-0405 (Item 9.8) and A-2024-0406 (Item 9.9)

2494747 Ontario Ltd. 


98 - 100 Rutherford Road South


CHINGUACOUSY CON 2, EHS, Part Lot 4, and RP 43R39471, Parts 3 and 4, Ward 3


The purpose of the application is to request consent to sever a parcel of land currently having a total area of approximately 62,115 square metres (15.34 acres) and a partial discharge of mortgage. The proposed parcel has a frontage of approximately 45.68 metres (149.87 feet), a depth of approximately 63.24 metres (207.48 feet) and approximately 1,433 square metres (0.35 acres). The effect of the application is to provide for a lot addition to the adjacent property municipally known as 25 Clark Boulevard.

12824752 Canada Inc. c/o Madan Sharma


7646 Kennedy Road South


Toronto Con 1, EHS, Part Lot 14, Ward 3


The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to the grant of an access easement. It is proposed that a vehicular access easement covering an approximate area of 770 square metres (0.19 acres) be established in favor of the adjacent southeast property to facilitate a future condominium road. 

Pauline Reichert


37 Guest Street


Plan BR 31, Part Lot 1, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure proposed shed having a setback of 0.13 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line;
  2. To permit an accessory structure proposed shed having a setback of 0.31 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line;
  3. To permit an accessory structure proposed shed, having a height of 3.38 metres (11.09 feet), whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.00 metres;
  4. To permit a combined gross floor area of 41.28 square metres (444.33 square feet.) for two (2) accessory structures, whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; and
  5. To permit an accessory structure proposed shed having a gross floor area of 27.88 square metres (300.10 square feet.), whereas, the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure.

Additional correspondence was received and posted to the agenda on December 9, 2024.

Farhan Tahir, Amber Farhan 


244 Morningmist Street 


Plan M1260, Part Lot 35, RP 43R23210, Part 14, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 5.69 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 4.9 metres.

Japneet Kaur


16 Bedford Crescent


Plan 651, Lot 107, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.72 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres; and
  2. To permit 0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Parminder Bath, Hartaran Bath


36 Love Court


Plan 1996, Lot 17, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.41 metres, whereas by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres;
  2. To permit a parking space depth of 3.67 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking space depth of 5.4 metres; and
  3. To permit 0.0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Ameet Manohar, Sangeeta Ameet


27 Troyer Street


Plan 43M2022, Lot 58, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.15m to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

Sky High Holdings Ltd.


129 Wexford Road


Plan M631, Lot 40, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a maximum driveway width of 8.4 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and
  2. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting westerly side lot line, and 0.44 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the easterly side lot line,  whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting both side lot lines.

Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow Lot A to have a lot width of 56.0 metres, whereas the by-law requires Lot A to have a minimum lot width of 100 metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256; 
  2. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building A to be located outside the area identified on the Schedule, whereas the by-law requires that Building A to be located in accordance with the building footprint outline on Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  3. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building A with a gross commercial floor area not exceeding 3,075 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a gross commercial floor area for Building A shall not exceed 1,900 square metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  4. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be maintained outside the approved location, whereas the by-law requires on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be developed and maintained in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256;
  5. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 2.6 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along the westerly side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a 3 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along side lot line in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  6. To allow angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 1.9 metres in width and 4.35 metres in length, whereas the by-law requires angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.7 metres in width and 5.4 metres in length; 
  7. To allow a minimum parking aisle width of 4.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width 6.6 metres; 
  8. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 4.4 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, excepted for the driveway access points, whereas the by-law requires that a 4.5 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, except for the driveway access points in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  9. To permit 1 loading space, whereas the by-law requires 2 loading spaces. 
    *parking breakdown not provided to confirm if there is sufficient parking on site. In addition, tandem parking is only permitted for 50% of the required parking for motor vehicle repair. 

Associated applications B-2024-0018 (Item 8.1) and A-2024-0406 (Item 9.8)

Polco Investments Limited c/o Jay Lim


2250, 2280 and 2300 Queen Street East 


Chinguacousy Con 6 EHS Part Lot 6 and RP 43R13972, Part 1, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building B and Building C to be located outside the area identified on the Schedule, whereas the by-law requires that Building B and Building C to be located in accordance with the building footprint outline on Schedule ‘C- Section 256;
  2. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to permit Building B with a gross commercial floor area not exceeding 2,840 square metres, whereas the by-law requires a gross commercial floor area for Building B shall not exceed 1,400 square metres in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256;
  3. To allow angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.6 metres in width and 3.4 metres in length; whereas the by-law requires angled parking space shall to a rectangular area measuring 2.7 metres in width and 5.4 metres in length; 
  4. To allow 147 parking spaces to be provided on site, whereas the by-law requires a 158 parking spaces to be provided on site; 
  5. To allow a minimum parking aisle width of 2.2 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum parking aisle width 6.6 metres; 
  6. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 4.4 metres wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, excepted for the driveway access points,  whereas the by-law requires that a 4.5 metres wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along Highway Number 7, except for the driveway access points in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  7. To allow 1 loading space to be provided on site, whereas the by-law requires 2 loading spaces to be provided on site; 
  8. To vary Schedule ‘C’, Section 256 of the by-law to allow a 0m wide landscape open space area to be provided and maintained along the easterly side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a 3m wide landscape open space area shall be provided and maintained along side lot line in accordance with Schedule ‘C- Section 256; 
  9. To Vary Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256 to allow on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be maintained outside the approved location, whereas the by-law requires on-site parking spaces and spaces for the storage of motor vehicles to be developed and maintained in accordance with Schedule ‘C’ – Section 256.
    *parking breakdown not provided to confirm if there is sufficient parking on site. Still require the distance from the loading space to the severance line 

Associated applications B-2024-0018 (Item 8.1) and A-2024-0405 (Item 9.7)

Raj Kishore Gupta, Priya Gupta


11 Fallen Oak Court


Plan M740, Lot 48, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.23 metres to an existing exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.3 metres to an exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in the interior side yard provided that a continuous side yard width of no less than 1.2 metres (3.94 feet) is provided on the opposite side of the dwelling.

Shilpa Shilpa, Nitin Khanna


34 Hollowgrove Blvd


Plan M137,7 Part Lot  92, RP 43R24700,  Parts(s) 17, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a personal service shop (salon) as a home occupation in a semi-detached dwelling, whereas the by-law only permits an office as a home occupation in a semi-detached dwelling; and
  2. To permit 0 parking spaces for a 18.59 square metres home occupation, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of one parking space for every 20.0 square metres of floor area occupied by the home occupation. 

Manjit Singh


4 Golan Drive 


Plan M1429, Lot 71, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed single-storey garden suite having a gross floor area of 45 square metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 35 square metres for a garden suite in all other Residential zones. 

1000918532 Ontario Inc. 


12-2131 Williams Parkway 


Peel Condo, Plan 416, LVL 1, Unit 12, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit the use of manufacturing of wine and spirits, whereas the by-law does not permit the manufacturing of food.

Phuc Thinh Nguyen, Trang Thi Thao Nguyen


134 Larkspur Road 


Plan M1262, Lot 66, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required exterior side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.85 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

McVean Plaza Inc. 


9995 McVean Drive 


Plan 43M1951, Part Block 26, RP 43R36905, Parts 1 & 2, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a day nursery in Unit 3B, whereas the by-law does not permit the use.

Christopher Martin Spencer, Sylan Ros


23 Oblate Crescent 


Plan 43M1707, Lot 216, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an existing above grade entrance in an interior side yard, used as a principal entrance to a proposed attached ARU, having a height of 0.79 metres to the landing, whereas the by-law requires a maximum height of 0.6 metres to a landing for an above grade entrance, used as a principal entrance to an attached ARU, in a side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.35 metres to an existing above grade stair & landing leading to an above grade side entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 0.9 metres to any steps or landings for such side entrance.

Dharsheni Ramesh, Sudharasanam Varadharajan


17 Silktop Trail


Plan M1300, Lot 25, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 2.01 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.00 metres.

Lilani DeSilva


91 Desert Sand Drive 


Plan M1068, Part Lot 179, RP 43R21345, Parts 1 and 3, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a two-unit dwelling in a quattroplex, whereas the by-law does not permit the use; 
  2. To permit a below grade entrance in the rear yard, whereas the by-law requires the entire rear yard to be landscaped open space.
  3. To permit a below grade entrance in a quattroplex, whereas the by-law does not permit a below grade entrance in a quattroplex.
  4. To permit a 0.92 metre wide pedestrian path of travel leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit, whereas the by-law requires an unobstructed pedestrian path of travel having a minimum width of 1.2 metre leading to the principal entrance of an additional residential unit.

Manicka Krishnakumar, Komani Krishnakumar


76 Redfinch Way


Plan M1439, Part Block 235, RP 43R25799,  Parts(s) 6, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required interior side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.36 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.20 metres.

Adward Asei, Flurins Audeshu


42 Keith Monkman Way 


Plan 43M2058, Lot 262, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 3.1 metres to an existing deck, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 3.5 metres to a deck off the main floor.

Rehan Chaudary 


9780 Bramalea Road 


Chinguacousy Con 4, Part Lot 9, Plan M72, Part Blocks F and K, RP 43R10246, Parts 1 to 3, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a commercial school (tutoring centre) to operator out of Unit 203, whereas the by-law does not permit the use.

Robin Singh


586 Conservation Drive 


Plan 893 Lot 2, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a minimum lot area of 0.35 hectares, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot area of 0.4 hectares;
  2. To permit a minimum lot width of 29 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum lot width of 36.5 metres;
  3. To permit a setback of 28.62 metres from the centre line of a street, whereas the by-law requires a minimum centre line setback of 32.0 metres;
  4. To permit the surface area of a semi-circular driveway to be 52.08% of the front yard area, whereas the by-law permits a maximum 50% of the front yard area to be residential driveway;
  5. To permit 0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Lovepreet Bhullar, Gurneet Kaur


74 Traverston Court


Plan M101, Part Lot 195, RP 43R4800, Parts 5,6, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit the parking of an oversized motor vehicle (2023 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500 WB 170 Cargo) having a length of 6.97 metres and a height of 2.88 metres on a residential driveway, whereas the by-law does not permit the parking of an oversized motor vehicle.

Pushpinder Gill, Baljodh Gill


44 Willow Park Drive 


Plan M1340, Lot 156, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a rear yard setback of 6.126 metres to a proposed sunroom addition, whereas the by-law requires a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres.

Packall Consultants (1981) Limited


2 Shaftsbury Lane 


Plan 977, Part Block K, RP 43R18943, Part 1, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To allow outside storage to be screened by a fence containing an iron-rod swing gate, whereas the by-law requires outside storage to be screened from view by a solid fence; and
  2. To allow a maximum height of 5.0 metres for outside storage (truck trailers), whereas the by-law permits a height of 3.0 metres.

Paramsivam Arumugam, Chaitall Nandkumar Agaskar


1 Copeland Road 


Plan M426, Lot 159, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 2.7 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

9.26

This item has attachments. 

Kevin Michael, Christine Michael


4 Alderway Avenue


Plan 646, Part Lots 151,152, Ward 3


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1.  To permit a driveway width of 8.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 6.71 metres.

Additional correspondence was received and posted to the agenda on December 9, 2024. 

1000974134 Ontario Inc. 


2500 Williams Parkway, Unit 6 and 7


PSCP 1081, LVL 1, Unit 6 & 7, Ward 8


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit food manufacturing (Indian sweets), whereas the by-law does not permit the use; and
  2. To permit 22.22% retail in connection with the food manufacturing, whereas the by-law permits a maximum of 15% retail in connection with a permitted industrial use. 

Ali Qadirian, Mariam Qadirian


46 Everingham Circle 


Plan 43M1740, Lot 12, Ward 9


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 0.37 metres setback to the landing for an above grade side entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum setback of 0.9 metres (2.95 feet) to any steps (or landing) in the interior side yard.

Nilaykumar Patel, Komalben Patel 


15 Braddock Drive


Plan 43M1661, Lot 117, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard; and 
  2. To permit a proposed exterior side yard setback of 1.8 metres to a stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 3.0 metres.

Primont (M3 Condos) Inc. 


10629 Mississauga Road 


Plan 43M1985, Block 1, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit 14 storeys to be located within the remainder of the lot, whereas the by-law requires 12 storeys to be located within the remainder of the lot; and
  2. To permit each dwelling unit in an apartment and multiple residential dwellings a minimum required parking shall be 0.8 parking spaces for residents, whereas the by-law requires each dwelling unit in an apartment and multiple residential dwellings a minimum required parking shall be 1 parking spaces for residents.

Christine Haye- Callaghan


70 Commodore Drive 


Plan M1751, Lot 229L, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard; and
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 0.21 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.2 metres.

(See item 7.4)


Deferred from October 2, 2018

Mohammed Ilyas 


2257 and 2267 Embleton Road 


Chinguacousy, CON 5, WHS, Part Lot 5, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a Day Nursey, whereas the by-law does not permit the use;
  2. To permit 40% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space, whereas the Zoning by-law requires a minimum 70% of the required front yard to be landscaped open space;
  3. To permit a front yard setback of 8 metres, whereas the by-law requires a front yard setback of 12 metres;
  4. To permit a side yard setback of 6 metres, whereas the by-law requires a side yard setback of 7.5 metres; and
  5. To permit a building height of 12 metres, whereas the by-law permit of a maximum building height of 10 metres.

(See item 7.5)


Deferred from April 23 and June 18, 2024 

Baligh Graieb, Nora Graieb


10 Hazelwood Drive


Plan 717, Lot 100, Ward 7


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a front yard setback of 2.043 metres to a proposed ground floor addition (Attached Garage), whereas the by-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 9.0 metres; 
  2. To permit an interior side yard setback of 2.587 metres to a proposed ground floor addition (Attached Garage) whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.8 metres; 
  3. To permit an interior side yard setback of 1.952 metres to a proposed Ground Floor & Second Floor Addition whereas the by-law requires a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.8 metres; 
  4. To permit a lot coverage of 39.7%, whereas the by-law permits a maximum lot coverage of 25%; 
  5. To permit 2 accessory structures (Existing Pergola ‘C’ & Existing Shed ‘B’) to be constructed on an easement, whereas the by-law does not permit accessory structures to be constructed upon any easement; 
  6. To permit 3 accessory structures whereas the zoning by-law permits a maximum of not more than one swimming pool enclosure, and two accessory buildings, other than a swimming pool on a lot; 
  7. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘A’) having a gross floor area of 18.95 square metres (204 square feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  8. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘A’) having a height of 3.2 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; 
  9. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) to be used for human habitation, whereas the by-law does not permit an accessory structure to be used for human habitation; 
  10. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) having a gross floor area of 37.34 square metres (402 square feet), whereas the by-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 15 square metres for an individual accessory structure; 
  11. To permit an accessory structure (Existing Pergola ‘C’) having a height of 3.1 metres, whereas the by-law permits an accessory structure having a maximum height of 3.0 metres; 
  12. To permit a combined gross floor area of 71.34 square metres for three (3) accessory structures, whereas the by-law permits a maximum combined gross floor area of 20 square metres for two (2) accessory structures; and
  13. To permit a semicircular Residential Driveway with a maximum surface area of 59.29% of the front yard area, whereas the by-law permits a maximum surface area of 50% of the front yard area for a Residential Driveway.

Deferred from April 23, July 16, August 20, and October 15, 2024

Tri-Cav Investments Ltd.


170 Bovaird Drive West, Unit 8


Con 1, WHS Part Lot 11, Ward 2


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a day nursey, whereas the by-law does not permit a day nursey.

Deferred from May 21 and September 17, 2024

Susanne Rosyln George, Rudolph Elliot George


57 Creditstone Road


Plan M829, Lot 34, Ward 4


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 10.74 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7 metres; and 
  2. To permit 0 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side property line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from September 17, 2024


(See item 7.2)

Jeyachithra Manickam


11 Streamline Drive 


Plan 43M1647, Lot 342, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required side yard; 
  2. To permit a 0.57 metres side yard setback to a proposed exterior stairway leading to below grade entrance in the required interior side yard, resulting in a combined side yard width of 1.22 metres, whereas the by-law requires a minimum side yard setback of 0.6 metres provided that the combined total for both side yards on an interior lot is 1.8 metres; and 
  3. To permit a maximum driveway width of 7.91 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres.

Deferred from September 17, 2024

Tarlochan Singh


8 Antler Road 


Plan 43M1613, Lot 125, Ward 1


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a setback of 0.57 metres to the rear lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line;  
  2. To permit an accessory structure (existing shed) having a setback of 0.40 metres to the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres to the nearest lot line; 
  3. To permit a driveway width of 10.19 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.00 metres; 
  4. To permit 0.21 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from September 17, 2024

Abhinav Sharma, Mridula Sharma


38 Eastman Drive 


Plan 43M2087, Lot 24, Ward 5


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance in a required side yard, whereas the by-law does not permit exterior stairways constructed below established grade in the required exterior side yard; and
  2. To permit an exterior side yard setback of 3.39 metres to a proposed exterior stairway leading to a below grade entrance, whereas the by-law requires a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5 metres.

(See item 7.7)


Deferred from October 15, 2024

Jaswinder Singh Khosa, Jagdeep Kaur


19 Leo Austin Road 


Plan 43M1958, Lot 81, Ward 10


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 8.305 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.32 metres; and
  2. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line, whereas the by-law requires a minimum of 0.6 metres of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from October 15, 2024

Jaspreet Singh, Jasbeer Singh, Banvir Kaur


12 Loomis Road


Plan 43M2038, Lot 69, Ward 6


The applicant(s) are requesting the following variance(s):

  1. To permit a driveway width of 7.70 metres, whereas the by-law permits a maximum driveway width of 7.0 metres; and
  2. To permit 0.30 metres of permeable landscaping abutting both side lot lines, whereas the by-law requires a minimum 0.6m of permeable landscaping abutting the side lot line.

Deferred from October 15. 2024

Next Scheduled Meeting:   January 28, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.

No Item Selected